On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:45:07AM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> David Boyce wrote:
>
> > I'm unsurprised at seeing no public response to
> > yours either. But disappointed.
>
> I'm not disappointed. Paul doesn't work for me so there is no obligation
> for him to write patches or design specs
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 07:18:32PM +, Troy Runkel wrote:
> FYI,
>
> I believe I've located the fix in the GNU make CVS repository that resolves
> the
> excessive stat() call problem. I've back-ported the fix into 3.82 and it
> appears
> to be working in our build system. The patch for 'rea
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 12:03:35AM +0300, Thomas Backlund wrote:
> 02.08.2010 23:51, Sam Ravnborg skrev:
> >>
> >> Thanks, this seems to fix the first issue, but then I get the same erro on
> >> the following line 190:
> >>
> >> 190: bootwrapper_
>
> Thanks, this seems to fix the first issue, but then I get the same erro on
> the following line 190:
>
> 190: bootwrapper_install %.dtb:
> 191:$(Q)$(MAKE) ARCH=ppc64 $(build)=$(boot) $(patsubst %,$(boot)/%,$@)
>
Obviously - dunno how I missed that.
Updated patch below.
I will do a
owerpc build broke with make 3.82.
It failed with the following message:
arch/powerpc/Makefile:183: *** mixed implicit and normal rules. Stop.
The fix is to avoid mixing non-wildcard and wildcard targets.
Reported-by: Thomas Backlund
Cc: Michal Marek
Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg
---
d
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 02:07:56PM -0700, Jeremiah Perry wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't know if the following is a bug or not, but it came to my
> attention recently. I ran make on a project only to have make stop
> abruptly with no error messages. After some digging, I found one of my
> dependencies re
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 07:24:50PM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 07:12:53PM -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> ...
> >> Makefile:442: *** mixed implicit and normal rules. Stop.
> >&g
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 07:24:50PM -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 07:12:53PM -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> ...
> >> Makefile:442: *** mixed impli
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 07:12:53PM -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-10-26 at 23:15 +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > Can you give me a more precise pointer where we have this issue
> > so I can get it fixed. I guess it is Makefile.build...
>
> If you mean in the Linux
On Sun, Oct 26, 2008 at 05:48:11PM -0400, Paul Smith wrote:
> Hi all;
>
> While working on some changes to 2nd expansion etc. to try to reduce
> total heap usage in GNU make, I've discovered that there is a bug in the
> current makefile parsing. My new version doesn't have this bug (or,
> more pr
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 04:00:22PM +0530, A, Sravanthi wrote:
> Team,
>
> Can any one of you help to resolve this issue.
> My file structure will have root make file which will call makefiles in
> each subfolder. Some of the CC files which are dependant on other folder
> object files are getting
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 05:36:56AM -0700, rakesh aggarwal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I read the GNU make manual and found there are $(or condition ) and $(and
> condition ) functions. ( at
> http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/make.html#Conditional-Functions )
> But i didnt get in which format i have
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 09:59:41PM -0800, rohith s wrote:
> hi
>
> this is rohith.s i am very new to this embedded field i have some doubt on
> make gnu tool(make-3.8) windowsxp platform my project is porting linux
> into some target processor so i need to generate linux kernel image so can
> i
>
> gmake
>
> will fail, giving
>
> gmake: *** No rule to make target `-lfunny_name', needed by `my_program'.
> Stop.
>
> while
>
> "mkdir temp; gmake"
To create a directory I usually do:
obj := temp
# Create output directory if not already present
_dummy := $(shell [ -d $(obj) ] || mkdir
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:10:48PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > From: Paul Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 12:37:46 -0400
> > Cc:
> >
> > I'm considering switching from CVS to another form of SCM.
>
> Can you tell why?
Paul already wrote:
"I would like some more advance
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 04:13:57PM +0530, Gupta, Sonia (Product Engineering
Services, Mumbai) wrote:
> Hi,
> While doing qmake calculator.pro we get an error Qfile:: file not
> specified.atleast 100 times. Can you tell us why is that.
I can only tell this is not a make error.
So please direct you
On Fri, Jul 27, 2007 at 12:13:16PM +0530, Laxman wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> While creating a executable for x86 target - Lynx OS found following error
>
>
>
>
>
> Reading makefiles...
> Updating goal targets
> File `first' does not exist.
>File `all' does not exist.
> File `cal
On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 08:50:32PM +0200, Stephan Beal wrote:
> Hi, Makers!
>
> i just discovered a Make behaviour which really surprises me. While that
> in itself is nothing new ;), this one certainly violates the principal
> of least astonishment:
>
> When a $(warning) or $(error) is inside
On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 05:25:50AM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Your
> reverse = $(2) $(1)
> example in the manual is great, however if one day your users happen
> to want to quote a comma,
> OK:;echo $(call reverse,a,b)
> SORRY1:;echo $(call reverse,a\,b,c)
> SORRY2:;echo $(call reverse,"a,
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 05:24:21AM +0100, ajay parashar wrote:
> Hi,
> I am using fedora 6. i write a simple hello world kernel module
> i write following makefile for building this module.
> ###
>
> obj-m+=hello.o
> all:
> make -c /lib/modules/ $(sh
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 07:36:27AM +, Guyeng Gankhuyag wrote:
> on PIII 800 PC System, Ubuntu 5.04, kernel 2.6.10-5-386
>
> the build breaks whenever I include the ext2_fs.h header into C file as
> simple as following:
>
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #include
> Details:
>
> This section needs an example and/or more clarification.
>
> http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/make.html#index-order_002donly-prerequisites-155
>
Last time this was requested there was noone that could cook up
a sensible example for this strange feature.
So unless you come u
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 03:06:33AM +0200, Terry Jones wrote:
> Hi Martin
>
> | > base = xxx-$(shell date '+%Y%m%d-%H%M%S')
> |
> | Perhaps you wanted := instead of =. The difference is explained in (for
> | example):
> |
> | http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/html_node/Reading-Makefiles.ht
Any reply for this one?
I still do not get the rationale behind it.
A quick (very quick) grep in the make soruce did not tell me anything.
Sam
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 11:57:51PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> This is with GNU Make 3.80
>
> Consider following Makefile:
&g
This is with GNU Make 3.80
Consider following Makefile:
.PHONY: $(MAKECMDGOALS)
$(MAKECMDGOALS):
@echo $@
As expected it prints out the targetname when supplied with a filename
as parameter (no matter if the file exists or not):
make foo.c => foo.c
When I try specifying an existing dir
[linux-kernel added. Please keep both bug-make and linux-kernel]
On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 10:46:25AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Content-Description: message body text
> Hi all. I've set Reply-To: to the bug-make@gnu.org list; I'm hoping we
> can keep the discussion there since I don't subscri
On Sun, Mar 05, 2006 at 05:21:08PM -0500, Paul D. Smith wrote:
> %% Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> sr> I foresee a lot of mails to lkml the next year or more with this
> sr> issue if kept. People do build older kernels and continue to do so
> sr>
On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 01:44:48AM -0400, Paul D. Smith wrote:
> %% Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> dj> The messages on submakes aren't perfect.
> dj> make[1]: Entering directory `/tmp'
> dj> make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp'
> dj> You mean "starting submake 1" and especially
On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 05:17:55PM -0500, Boris Kolpackov wrote:
> Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > >From info make:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > Rule Definition
> > ---
On Sat, Jun 26, 2004 at 04:18:06PM -0500, Boris Kolpackov wrote:
>
> Another patch, which I think you may be interested in, is
> pattern-specific-expansion.patch. Here is the description:
>
> The following makefile prints 'B' instead of 'A'.
>
> a := A
>
> %bar : arg := $a
>
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 06:05:24PM -0800, Carl Miller wrote:
>
> $(filter %.a,$(TARGETLIBS)) : %.a : $(%_OBJS)
> $(AR) rc $@ $^
> $(RANLIB) $@
Form 'info make':
Reading Makefiles | How 'make' Reads a makefile
--
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 11:27:38PM +, J. Grant wrote:
> Greetings
>
> Could someone direct me to documentation on the various return codes
> make returns please? I could not spot any so far in the man/info pages
> or source code.
info make
Look for the menu "* Invoking make: Running."
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 03:58:04PM +0700, Do Manh Hung wrote:
> I'm installed Qt right way with threading support, I think so.
> (configure -thread then make and make install)
> But I can not install kdeverlop on Solaris9 x86 because of error :
> configure:27069: error: Qt (>= Qt 3.0) (library qt-
On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 12:34:50PM -0500, Daniel Shane wrote:
> For users, that means that instead of
>
> $(filter-out $(str1), $(str2))
>
> it woudl become
>
> $(filter-out ($sort $(str1)), ($sort $(str2)))
That would in some usages have influence on linking order, which
will be a disaster to
On Fri, Jan 09, 2004 at 01:41:45PM -0500, Dale R. Worley wrote:
> It would be a useful thing if Make variable names were forbidden to
> contain slash (`/'), as well as `:', `#', and `='.
If you take a look at the linux 2.6 kernel you will see '/' used
all over the place in variables.
So my vote is
On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 12:46:24PM +, sudhakar Avirneni wrote:
>
> Server version: Apache/2.0.48
> Server built: Nov 1 2003 05:42:18
Hi Sudhakar.
This mailing list is used to report bugs in make itself, not in the build
process of Apache or similar tools.
What you report looks like a bug i
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 12:21:49PM +0900, Dominique DEUFF wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have to rebuild a project with the makefile I join at the end.
> I obtain this error :
> makefile:71: *** Recursive variable `LIBS' references itself
> (eventually). Stop
>
>
On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 12:33:48AM -0700, Erkin Borucu wrote:
> My name is Erkin.
> I have small problem
> I m first install this program.
> Can you help me ?
>
> Report bugs to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] src]# make
> g++ -O2 --pipe -I/usr/local/include -c -o
> LDAPException.o LDAPE
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 01:53:48PM +0400, Peter A. Kerzum wrote:
> I used this trick with rather complex define/eval constructs
> It really works but sometimes gives me 'virtual memory exhaused'
> If you (Sam) are interested, I can give you precise example.
I would be glad to see that - if not for
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 05:18:04PM -0400, Paul D. Smith wrote:
>
> sr> Is it coorect behaviour that make does not expand the variable
> sr> $(deps_foo.o)?
>
> Yes, because that's not the variable you asked to expand. You asked it
> to expand the variable $(deps_%).
Got it now, found the rig
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 05:26:54PM -0400, Paul D. Smith wrote:
>
> No make expands $* in the prerequisites list to the name of the target.
Hmmm..
foo.o : _$* FORCE
echo $^
FORCE:
I expected make to print out:
make: *** No rule to make target `_foo.o', needed by `foo.o'. Stop.
But I g
I'm having troubles using static patters.
See following example:
deps_foo.o := foo.h
foo.o : % : $(deps_%) bar.h FORCE
@echo $^
FORCE:
When executed I expected it to print:
foo.h bar.h FORCE
But it only prints bar
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 11:01:02PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> I'm having troubles using static patters.
> See following example:
>
> deps_foo.o := foo.h
>
> foo.o : % : $(deps_%) bar.h FORCE
>
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 02:42:36PM +0200, Haeusler Reinhard wrote:
>
> I wanted to set a variable depending on another variable to different
> values.
You need to use a few tricks to do this.
I have rewritten the code you provided:
> VAR2 = $(if ??? $(VAR1), S1, s, $(if ??? $(VAR1), M, m)) # ???
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 12:12:38AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
> [Please retain the CC to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so
>that the Debian Bug Tracking system can record your input]
>
> This was a feature request from a Debian user.
>
> I would like a way to list all d
On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 04:36:20PM -0400, Paul D. Smith wrote:
> %% Sam Ravnborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> sr> When a variable is followed by a comment the variable is assigned
> sr> a value containing a space.
>
> Yes. This is documented in the manual a
When a variable is followed by a comment the variable is assigned a value
containing a space.
Sample Makefile:
--
var1 := X
var2 := X # Comment
$(warning var1=-$(var1)-)
$(warning var2=-$(var2)-)
all:
--
Output:
$make -v
GNU Make 3.80
Copyri
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 02:23:04PM +0200, Anton van Oosten wrote:
> L.S.
>
> When building KOffice 1.2.91 (Kpresenter) gmake 3.79 warns:"Output line too
> long." Then gmake exits in a way that suggests that some output line was
> truncated.
I tried to grep the make sources (3.80), and there was
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 02:52:49PM -0500, Pankratz, Theresa wrote:
> I am trying to compile a Pro*C project using gmake. One of the pc files in
> the project contains embedded PL/SQL. I have set SQLCHECK=SEMANTICS
> USERID=scott/tiger in the mk file. I keep getting errors that look like
> gmake
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 02:53:32PM +0200, DeZNiUS wrote:
> But when i try to compile any program, i have this error :
>
> Compilator : Dreamcast Profil
> Building Makefile: "E:\Documents and Settings\DEZNIUS\Bureau\COOL\Makefile.win"
> Finding dependencies for file: E:\Documents and
> Settings\DE
On Sun, Jun 22, 2003 at 04:15:13PM +0100, J. Grant wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm experiencing an odd effect using GNU Make version 3.79.1.
>
> When the file created during the execution of the makefile is deleted
> based on this line "$(BMP2C) $< $(*F) > $@" in the Makefile below.
>
> Does make have
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 06:17:45PM -0400, Paul D. Smith wrote:
>
> Yes, exactly.
>
> In fact, it was a regression in 3.79.1 which allowed it to "work" there,
> and I fixed that bug in 3.80. If you use older versions of GNU make
> you'll see they work like 3.80, not 3.79.1.
Thanks!
Then I apolog
Hi all.
Posted the following a few weeks ago - wondered if anyone could explain it.
I have stripped down the background info a bit - so the essense is kept.
TIA,
Sam
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 10:50:53PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> The following makefile exhibit the problem, also at
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 03:21:46PM +0100, Alex Hornby wrote:
>
> I've looked into this a bit more and it is VPATH related.
>
> If I copy PnL.idl from the source area into the build area then make
> thinks the suffix rule is fine.
>
> Alex.
>
>
> On Thu, 2003-04-03 at 12:40, Alex Hornby wrote:
On Sat, Jun 14, 2003 at 01:59:46PM +0400, Aleksej Mazunin wrote:
> Hello!
> I have a problem when trying to make Brahms application.
> Logfiles are attached.
Could you please attach them as plain text files.
Neither gunzip nor bunzip2 understand the format of the .zip file
you have attached.
May
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 10:36:11AM -0400, Paul D. Smith wrote:
>
> This would work:
>
> install:
> cd LINUX/mod; mod2=`echo *`
Or without launching a shell:
install:mod2 := $(patsubst LINUX/%,%,$(wildcard LINUX/*))
$(wildcard LINUX/*) will list all files in the LINUX directory
I have a few reports that when building the Linux 2.5.70 kernel
the build system is more noisy than supposed to be.
The problem is tracked down to usage of canned command sequences.
The following is from the makefiles:
#General definition (scripts/Makefile.lib)
if_changed_rule = $(if $(strip $? \
57 matches
Mail list logo
