Hello
On 05/07/06 00:26, Kshitij Yadav wrote:
Hello,
We had purchased the crossbow's MICAz, MIB520, audio sensor and mote-view.
After installation, when we run "make micaz" command, in the cygwin
window, it shows the error "*** no rule to make target MICAz. stop".
Looking into the info for the
Hi!
On 19/05/06 10:02, Parikshat Dubey wrote:
Hi!
I want to integrate my c source files with gtk source files(supplied by
thirdparty) and want to make a make file for that purpose.I know how to
devlop make file but donot know how i integrate gtk files into it .I
donot know how i shall start.
On 20/02/06 17:31, Robert Tellamalla wrote:
Hi,
While I am trying to install the Gnu make in to my system it is showing that
make is failed and goto dosbuild.bat
Hi,
There is a win32 binary in the download section of http://mingw.org/
Kind regards
JG
Hi,
On 11/01/06 00:30, Steve Buberl wrote:
Hello,
I just installed ubuntu to discover that there was no make program.
I am running latest ubuntu which includes the "make" package (version
3.80-9).
You can install it with:
$ sudo apt-get install make
Kind regards
JG
I have a problem when I try to compile any c program.
I work with Mac OS X.
This is what the system displays when I use "make"
###
/Users/Radhouani/IOTA/IOTA/default.mk:248: warning: overriding commands for
target `/Users/Radhouani/IOTA/IOTA/lib/lib.a'
/Users/Radhouani/IOTA/IOTA/de
Hi,
On 09/12/05 20:53, Frank P Esposito wrote:
Greetings --
The supplied make file for win32 (nmakefile) is broken for ver 3.80 --
There are references to functions in hash.c, but hash.obj is not included in
the makefile
Thanks, this is fixed in the latest beta of 3.81 and CVS.
Kind rega
Hello,
Could the test suite display the filenames it is diffing when it
displays "Comparing Output " and -debug is passed please?
I am trying to work out which log files correspond with a particular .mk
file and am not completely sure.
Could the .base files also be kept when -debug is passe
On 24/07/05 18:04, Paul D. Smith wrote:
%% "J. Grant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
jg> Perhaps there could be a way to force setting of config.h macro's
jg> for those circumstances.
I was thinking of something like that too. I have to go back and
examine that
Hi Paul,
[...]
jg> main.c:420: warning: missing initializer
jg> main.c:420: warning: (near initialization for `switches[30].type')
This one, IMO, could be a bug in GCC. As far as I can tell the
initializer is correct. The only way to avoid the warning seems to be
to put a full suite of 0
Hi Paul,
[...]
jg> I expect those macros were intended to be used with signed values,
jg> and now they are being used with unsigned values as well, which is
jg> bad.
No, I don't think so. I don't remember the details but my recollection
is that they were specifically designed to work wit
Hi David,
This is still in make3.81beta3: make.h
/usr/include/stdlib.h on my debian GNU/Linux box contains:
#define EXIT_FAILURE1 /* Failing exit status. */
So you could be right. Anyone know if this is 0 for a reason..?
Kind regards
JG
__
[...]
Well we can't use inline functions per se. GNU make still attempts to
be compilable by old K&R C compilers: it doesn't even rely on features
available in the first (1989) ANSI C standard, much less features not
found until the second (1999) ISO C standard (which is where inline was
introdu
Hi Paul,
[...]
jg> If I submit fixes for these would they be reviewed for inclusion ?
I'm happy to look at them, but they will not be easy to fix.
I'm happy to assist if needed. I hope the 3.81 release can have as few
warnings as possible.
jg> main.c:420: warning: missing initializer
Could (void)batch_filename_ptr; be added in this job.c to stop this
compile warning please? (or a different solution to stop the warning)
batch_filename_ptr
job.c: In function `construct_command_argv_internal':
job.c:2155: warning: unused parameter `batch_filename_ptr'
I just rebuilt with late
Hello,
I just built on GNU/Linux (gcc (GCC) 3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-8))
If I submit fixes for these would they be reviewed for inclusion ?
main.c:420: warning: missing initializer
main.c:420: warning: (near initialization for `switches[30].type')
main.c: In function `main':
main.c:1790: warning: c
Hello Marcos,
On 22/03/05 12:22, Marcos Lima Rodrigues wrote:
make:
/home/marcos/usr/src/AOMD/Util/buildUtil/getarch:
Command not found
(@(@re/locale/en_US/LC_MESSAGES/make.moMakefile:175:
/home/marcos/usr/src/AOMD/Util/buildUtil/make.common:
No such file or directory
make: *** No rule to make targ
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
make:invalid option -- a
There is not such an option to my knowledge. Please check the man page
(man make) to find the option you are looking for.
Please post make --version output if you have a bug report.
Kind regards
JG
___
Hi Art,
This morning I did a 'cvs update', rebuild, and installation of make,
and am seeing a problem when trying to build the current GCC snapshot.
The 'make' command bombs out at the point where the GCC build process
prints out 'Bootstrapping the compiler'. Unfortunately I've deleted my
build log
I noticed several files were not writable in the tar.gz package. Could
the files also be -wr- when it is the final release please?
Kind regards
JG
-r--r--r-- config.ami
-r--r--r-- configh.dos
-r--r--r-- config.h-vms
-r--r--r-- config.h.W32
-r--r--r-- Makefile.DOS
-r--r--r-- README
-r--r--r--
You might like to try with -d option to see if that reveals which
process is causing the problem.
it sounds as though a process is not handling SIGTERM (Ctrl+C)
correctly. (that means "die now"). You could try sending SIGINT ("please
die") which requests your process to exit as fast as it can. I t
Hello,
I have noticed some accidental mistakes with invalid VPATH directories.
I wonder if there is any way Make could first check the directories
are valid and list the ones which are invalid?
Would such a feature be supported if not already present? (I could not
find it)
Kind regards
JG
__
Hello
I noticed use of goto's in the latest cvs make source code. Are there
any plans to restructure so that goto/branches are not needed? goto's
make the algorithms a little unclear IMO.
There are several common macro's in use. i.e. "record_waiting_files()",
"return_STRING_N_HASH_2". Could the
Hi,
May I suggest you read the manual section "5.3 Parallel Execution":
http://www.gnu.org/software/make/manual/make.html
If you still have problems provide all the details and I will try to help.
Regards
JG
on the 17/04/04 11:43, Nandkumar Sambhaji Gophane wrote:
Hi ...
I am learn
Greetings
Could someone direct me to documentation on the various return codes
make returns please? I could not spot any so far in the man/info pages
or source code.
Best regards
JG
___
Bug-make mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/m
This is not a problem with make. You need Qt, I suggest you contact
your supplier of Qt. You could check that your shared libraries are on
the correct path kdevelop searches too. Perhaps you need to run
ldconfig? (or equivalent)
JG
on the 02/03/04 08:58, Do Manh Hung wrote:
I'm installed Qt
Hi,
on the 29/02/04 14:33, Paul D. Smith wrote:
%% "J. Grant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
jg> Are the make/tests working ok at present? I am testing with the
jg> latest CVS code. Using MSYS/rxvt as my shell environment, perl
jg> v5.6.1 compiled for msys.
They wo
You definitely need at least 0.12 and I think you'll really need
0.13.1.
Ok, thank you.
jg> They talk about having a preparation/boostrap script. I could not
jg> spot one in the CVS.
Check out the README.cvs file; there's a quick set of commands there
that will get you from a vanilla CVS ch
Hello,
Are the make/tests working ok at present? I am testing with the latest
CVS code. Using MSYS/rxvt as my shell environment, perl v5.6.1 compiled
for msys.
There are several problems, the output seems to be unable to be
determined as identical or different. I checked the output for the
firs
on the 28/02/04 22:31, Paul D. Smith wrote:
Actually locally I'm building now with autoconf 2.59, automake 1.8.2,
and gettext 0.14.1.
There was a big hurdle to get over to get to automake 2.5x but since
then the releases have been easy.
I do this because there are fixes to autoconf and automake a
Hello
I was about to test some changes on my GNU/Linux computer. I found that
the latest CVS source requires "Autoconf version 2.58 or higher". I
manually upgraded my distro version to 2.57 last year with great pains.
I was wondering why make needs to use the latest Autoconf version?
Would it be
Hi Paul
This bug has been fixed in the source for GNU make. The fix will be
available in the next release.
I wonder when the final testing phase before release of the next release
will be? If this testing phase or final release candidate is announced
I would be interested in giving it a try.
I t
How about figuring out a backwards compatible way to deal with paths
containing spaces?
Regards
JG
on the 30/01/04 07:26, Kamil Burzynski wrote:
Hello.
Recently I've decided to spend some time on open-source
project - and after short search I've found (on savannah site)
list of projects that
jg> Will this release be ISO C90 GNU Make? With other packages such
jg> as binutils standardising on C90 I am interested to know if
jg> anything is in the pipeline plan for Make.
"C90" GNU make? Is "C90" some shorthand for some version of the POSIX
standard I'm unaware of? I thought "C90"
Hello,
Will this release be ISO C90 GNU Make? With other packages such as
binutils standardising on C90 I am interested to know if anything is in
the pipeline plan for Make.
Best regards
JG
on the 18/01/04 21:46, Noel Yap wrote:
Will this release include the distributed make feature? If not, w
Hi,
Looks like a mame problem; rather than GNU Make being at fault. I
suggest you contact the website you received the source code from.
Please be sure to give them complete error logs. Not just the two lines
here.
Regards
JG
on the 20/01/04 18:49, Digerati . wrote:
dear sir i found this er
Hello Paul,
on the 22/11/03 20:10, Paul D. Smith wrote:
%% "J. Grant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
jg> Is there a reason why "template" was appended to this files name
jg> in CVS?
Because during the creation of the tarball releases the file is
processed t
Hello,
I have not heard anything about the patch I emailed on 2003-10-08:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg02796.html
Could someone consider it for addition please?
Kind regards
JG
___
Bug-make mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://m
Hello,
I have been reading about Lucent nmake
(http://www.bell-labs.com/project/nmake/). It looks interesting, they
use a different rule format, and include a preprocessor. There is a
comparison to GNU make
(http://www.bell-labs.com/project/nmake/faq/gmake.html). I was
wondering if GNU mak
Hi,
#define SIGINT 2 /* Interactive attention */
#define SIGILL 4 /* Illegal instruction */
#define SIGFPE 8 /* Floating point error */
#define SIGSEGV 11 /* Segmentation violation */
#define SIGTERM 15 /* Termination request *
Hi Earnie,
ok, I wonder if win32 has extra signals, this code 127, could these be
supported for win32 ports?
#define SIGINT 2 /* Interactive attention */
#define SIGILL 4 /* Illegal instruction */
#define SIGFPE 8 /* Floating point error */
#define SI
Hello,
What port of Make, specifically, do you use?
Hello, I am using a native win32 build I created of 3.80.
Kind regards
JG
___
Bug-make mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
Hello,
We use the system service to translate the code if the system provides
it (many UNIX systems provide strsignal() for example). If not we have
a predefined set of signals we translate, but if the signal is not a
member of that predefined list it's not translated.
ok, I wonder if win32 has e
Hello,
Thank you for your email.
on the 29/10/03 00:03, Paul D. Smith wrote:
%% "J. Grant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
jg> Could the signals and errors that Make displays include the text
jg> description of them? The same way that other programs do not
jg> retu
Hello,
Could the signals and errors that Make displays include the text description
of them? The same way that other programs do not return the errno.h value,
but the text that it corresponds too. Let me know if you would like to
implement this for make.
Kind regards
JG
e.g.:
Signal 127
z:\b
Hello,
As build.sh is generated from build.sh.in I believe it should be set to
executable, currently I have to "chmod 755 build.sh" it. Is there a
reason build.sh is not included in the make-3.80 distribution?
Should @REMOTE@ not default to cstms ? Currently I get the following
error until I hav
Hello,
I have attached patch a made to improve the description of the
BATCH_MODE_ONLY_SHELL mode when using --jobs. Please review it for
addition.
Is there a reason why "template" was appended to this files name in CVS?
Best regards
JG
2003-10-08 Jonathan R. Grant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
*
Hello,
> > As I mentioned before, I'm not interested in adding lots of new
> > options. Instead I want to implement one comprehensive option where
you
> > can specify exactly what types of output you want generated and which
> > you don't.
>
> I'm only suggesting o
Hello,
on the 24/09/03 05:38, Paul D. Smith wrote:
%% "J. Grant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
jg> I think expanding the output would be helpful. I would like to
jg> create a patch to add --no-silent, basically turns off the
jg> features of .SILENT, @, --silent.
A
GNU
make if I create the patch and submit to this list?
Regards
J. Grant
___
Bug-make mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
ext Paul D. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 4:21 AM
To: J. Grant
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Path to binary in --help or --version
[SNIP]
I'm still not very clear on why you want the path to make.
It seems to
me that checking the version value should be able to
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
__
It would also be useful to others wishing to determine where the make
they are running is actually on the filesystem.
JG
on the 08/07/03 03:21, Paul D. Smith wrote:
%% "J. Grant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I'm not sure how you imagine
Hi,
I'm not sure how you imagine this would work, or what use it would be.
If you run --version don't you already know that you have different
versions?
For instance, cygwin make ver 3.80 and msys/mingw make ver 3.80, both
installed, and used by different build processes. However, there are
pro
Hi,
One problem I have frequently come across is having multiple incompatible
versions of make installed.
This would be solved if the path was visible. Could the path to the binary
being run be added to the --help or --version output please?
Alternatively if I submit a patch to add this will it b
Hello,
I'm experiencing an odd effect using GNU Make version 3.79.1.
When the file created during the execution of the makefile is deleted
based on this line "$(BMP2C) $< $(*F) > $@" in the Makefile below.
Does make have a rule that "deletes all files cat into automated
filenames" on exit or s
54 matches
Mail list logo
