> > As I mentioned before, I'm not interested in adding lots of new
> > options. Instead I want to implement one comprehensive option where you
> > can specify exactly what types of output you want generated and which
> > you don't.
> > I'm only suggesting one option, to invert the --silent option. gcc and > most other programs also include "no-" versions of options which turn > things on. Do you mean that you are planning on implementing features > like this as an option that takes a number of values like "no-silent" ?
> > > Regards
> > I like that...
I added an "always echo" flag to make last year http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-make/2002-12/msg00058.html
I found it very useful debugging OTHERs makefiles (I got very annoyed with building something...).
I agree, to keep with GNU conventions I prefer your patch to having --debug=no-silent,no-jobs etc.
Is there a way I can vote for your patch Marty? Paul, could Marty's patch be reviewed again for inclusion please?
Regards
JG
_______________________________________________ Bug-make mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
