Re: Error Making GDB for eCos

2001-08-01 Thread Eric Christopher
On 01 Aug 2001 11:47:38 +, Thomas Joseph wrote: > Dear Sir > > I can't make the gdb stubs as an errore occurs. Please suggest any method to make >i386-elf-gdb from Insight or standard gbd. > You need to mail the ecos and gdb lists (see sources.redhat.com for more information on this). Thi

Re: assembler error

2001-07-21 Thread Eric Christopher
This is not applicable to make. You should either mail the glibc mailing list or the gas mailing list ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). -eric On 21 Jul 2001 15:04:43 +0200, jiv wrote: > ric -D_LIBC_REENTRANT -include ../include/libc-symbols.h -o signals.o > /tmp/ccAMGVRy.s: Assembler messages: > /tmp

Re: help with installation of GNU make on win98

2001-05-28 Thread Eric Christopher
On 28 May 2001 14:30:41 -0700, leon Saviski wrote: > hi; > i have a problems with installation GNU make. > I have WIN 98 2 ed. Whenever i try to do installation I fail.DO i have to > install CYGWIN? You can install cygwin, but you do not have to do so. Perhaps if you were to tell one of us what y

Re: Cannot find shell with make-3.79.1 on i686-pc-cygwin

2001-04-26 Thread Eric Christopher
> That was a "no" to your assertion. All of the Cygwin tools I'm using are > precompiled from Cygwin. Aaah. Then you don't want the complete environment? > > I was thinking as an alternative to hard-coding the shell to "/bin/sh.exe", > I could modify make to look for "sh.exe" on the path if

Re: Cannot find shell with make-3.79.1 on i686-pc-cygwin

2001-04-25 Thread Eric Christopher
Shawn Carey wrote: > > Thanks for the quick replies, folks! > > FYI, I'm using the bone-stock, cygwin compiled make executable with the > latest DLL (1.3.1-1). > So that was a yes to my assertion that you weren't using the binaries produced by the cygwin project? > At the risk of being a pest

Re: Cannot find shell with make-3.79.1 on i686-pc-cygwin

2001-04-25 Thread Eric Christopher
"Paul D. Smith" wrote: > > If you're using Cygwin's version of GNU make, you need to talk to them > about it. Their version is not the same as the "normal" FSF-distributed > GNU make. > > If you want to try the FSF version you can get it from: > > ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/make/ > I _think_

Re: foo has modification time in the future

2001-03-26 Thread Eric Christopher
Ala Ridha wrote: > > I keep getting messages about file modification time in the future when > I compile my programs using make in Solaris and Red Hat 7. > Sounds like you are: a) compiling over nfs b) the times are different between the two machines by some degree If this isn't the case let

Re: (no subject)

2001-03-08 Thread Eric Christopher
> "Stangl, Alex" wrote: > > P.S. A developer here told me afterwards I could use umount followed > by mount to fix the root mount point problem, but I didn't realize at > the time that CygWin supported the UNIX mount/unmount commands. > Yep. This is the right answer. -eric ps. can you avoid

Re: (no subject)

2001-03-08 Thread Eric Christopher
> "Stangl, Alex" wrote: > > OK, thanks for the info. I figured it worth a shot. My box is a > Pentium III, 600 MHz with 256 MB RAM, running NT 4.0 Workstation and > the "B20" version of CygWin. > Wow. This is quite old. You might want to try upgrading to the newest version of cygwin (www.cygw

Re: compilation problem

2000-12-12 Thread Eric Christopher
> This is not a problem with make. > > Please contact the author of Checker and/or GCC for help. > > as> gcc -c -DGCCCHECKER -I. -I./l-malloc -I. -I./lib -I./config/obj-formats > as> -I./config/i386/Linux -O2 -g -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes > as> ./config/i386/Linux/munmap.c -o munmap.o >

Re: Is this a bug or I "tosted" my CPU

2000-11-17 Thread Eric Christopher
> Also I have problems with temp files created by make on /tmp. > I see I have now less errors if I run make without -j5 option. > Is this a bug or I must change my CPU? > KDE2 team said me that is CPU's problems... Okay, a few things: 1) These aren't bugs in make. Isn't that a wonderful thing

Re: BUG

2000-10-13 Thread Eric Christopher
Michele De Luca wrote: > > When I run the gmake in digital machine I have this error: > > m2c not found > > can you help me??? > I'd look for m2c on your system and look in the makefile and install instructions for some guidance on what you need to compile the package you have. You could als

Re: long commands on windows nt return an error

2000-10-12 Thread Eric Christopher
You didn't specify what version of windows you are running on, or which shell you are using. I imagine that it is the dos shell from Win95 (or some such) which does have a fairly low limit of characters on a single line. A way around this is to either use the NT shell (slightly better) or use /b

Re: [Bug-make] Re: Building GNU packages

2000-09-17 Thread Eric Christopher
> > On the gcc FAQ it said to send questions pertaining to build > > problems to this address. I am a user on a Solaris 2.7 system, and I find > > the available software less than adequate. So I've decided to compile a > > bunch of the GNU software, and keep the GNU executables and other

Re: gmake query

2000-07-28 Thread Eric Christopher
Nirav, > gmake[2]: Entering directory `/home/postgres/postgresql-6.5.3/src/lextest' > > lex scan.l > gmake[2]: lex: Command not found >From looking at this I would guess that you need to have lex somewhere in your path when you build up the sql server. If you were to correct this your problem

Re: Help

2000-07-19 Thread Eric Christopher
> Your choices are: (1) change your makefile back to use UNIX line > endings, (2) get a fixed version of GNU make from Cygwin (ask them about > it), or (3) get the latest "regular" version of GNU make (3.79.1) from > the FSF (www.gnu.org) and build it for Windows (see the README.W32 file > for in