Shawn Carey wrote:
>
> Thanks for the quick replies, folks!
>
> FYI, I'm using the bone-stock, cygwin compiled make executable with the
> latest DLL (1.3.1-1).
>
So that was a yes to my assertion that you weren't using the binaries
produced by the cygwin project?
> At the risk of being a pest, do you know why the default shell is now
> prefixed with "/bin/"? I thought that searching PATH for the shell was
> pretty spiffy! It allowed our build environment to work on a variety of
> systems with a mere adjustment to the PATH variable.
>
No idea. Safer that way though.
-eric
--
I will not dissect things unless instructed
_______________________________________________
Bug-make mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-make
