Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> np->allocsize is the number of bytes allocated for the file, right? (rounded
> up to a block multiple).
>
> Is it okay for np->allocsize to be initially as big as needed to contain the
> file, rather than the actual d
Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> np->allocsize is the number of bytes allocated for the file, right? (rounded
> up to a block multiple).
It's the amount that diskfs knows it can use without diskfs_grow.
> Is it okay for np->allocsize to be initially a
Answers to this stuff should really come from Thomas. I am just speaking
directly out of my ass here, without even source on hand to read.
> np->allocsize is the number of bytes allocated for the file, right? (rounded
> up to a block multiple).
I would not put it exactly that way
Hi,
np->allocsize is the number of bytes allocated for the file, right? (rounded
up to a block multiple).
Is it okay for np->allocsize to be initially as big as needed to contain the
file, rather than the actual disk space allocated for the file? AFAICS, it
is sufficient if diskfs_grow do
