Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> np->allocsize is the number of bytes allocated for the file, right? (rounded
> up to a block multiple).
> 
> Is it okay for np->allocsize to be initially as big as needed to contain the
> file, rather than the actual disk space allocated for the file? AFAICS, it
> is sufficient if diskfs_grow does the right thing in this case.

You're only doing a read-only implementation, right?  In that case,
np->allocsize is essentially unused... ;)

Reply via email to