James Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Off the current topic I've been looking at the symlink server
> recently and there are two mach_port_t 's that I noticed. One is
> realnode and the other is realnodenoauth. What is the difference
> between these port_t's.
realnode comes from the fs
--- Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > For now at least for RLIMIT_CORE I think we should just accept
> any hard
> > maximum. However, to implement core dumps would that be a core
> server
> > that actually implemented limits on core sizes and such?
>
> Yes. If the limit is zero, then
> For now at least for RLIMIT_CORE I think we should just accept any hard
> maximum. However, to implement core dumps would that be a core server
> that actually implemented limits on core sizes and such?
Yes. If the limit is zero, then you don't call the crash server at all (we
don't call it t
> I have found the offending piece of code.
>
>original_real_uid = getuid();
> original_effective_uid = geteuid();
>
> #ifdef HAVE_SETRLIMIT
> /* If we are installed setuid root be careful to not drop
> core. */
> if (original_real_uid != original_effective_uid) {
