> For now at least for RLIMIT_CORE I think we should just accept any hard > maximum. However, to implement core dumps would that be a core server > that actually implemented limits on core sizes and such?
Yes. If the limit is zero, then you don't call the crash server at all (we don't call it the "core server" because then we'd want to use names like /servers/core and /hurd/core, and we're afraid of well-meaning cron jobs). For a limit of another finite size, it's just like the RLIMIT_FSIZE limits that we also don't implement--it would be arranged somehow with the filesystem server. _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
