Re: cross-gnu

2013-07-07 Thread Lluís
Lluís writes: > Not sure this is the right place, so please redirect me if there exists > someplace more appropriate. > I'm building a cross-toolchain for hurd following [1], and here's a few bugs > I've found along the way: > * Using the tarball from [2], I had to remove an option from GCC's

Re: cross-gnu

2013-07-03 Thread Lluís
Lluís writes: > Not sure this is the right place, so please redirect me if there exists > someplace more appropriate. Ooops, sorry for the repeated messages. I thought they were not arriving. Lluis -- "And it's much the same thing with knowledge, for whenever you learn something new, the w

Re: cross-gnu revived

2010-04-13 Thread Samuel Thibault
Ludovic Courtès, le Tue 13 Apr 2010 09:51:04 +0200, a écrit : > However, to begin with, would it be possible to skip the > cross-compilation phase of MIG/Mach/Hurd and instead compile glibc, > Binutils, etc., with just the header files that would normally be > installed by Mach/Hurd? Or maybe that

Re: cross-gnu revived

2010-04-13 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello, Thomas Schwinge writes: > This is just to tell you that cross-gnu is back alive. See > . [...] > Seriously, there is a Grand Plan of evolving this into a complete > regression testing system: use these toolchains to b

Re: cross-gnu toolchain GCC 4.2

2007-12-20 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 12:20:43PM +0530, Shakthi Kannan wrote: > - On Dec 20, 2007 2:54 AM, Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | What > | does a ``cd $GCC_SRC/ && svn diff'' tell? Does the output look like my > | patch file? > \-- > > I enter into root/src/gcc and do svn di

Re: cross-gnu toolchain GCC 4.2

2007-12-20 Thread Shakthi Kannan
Hi, - On 12/20/07, Shakthi Kannan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | I enter into root/src/gcc and do svn diff and it doesn't return | anything. \-- Yes, the patch is not getting applied. "apply_gcc_patches" doesn't work in the Makefile. Anyways, I wrote the Makefile to get an understanding of the

Re: cross-gnu toolchain GCC 4.2

2007-12-19 Thread Shakthi Kannan
Hi, - On Dec 20, 2007 2:54 AM, Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | What | does a ``cd $GCC_SRC/ && svn diff'' tell? Does the output look like my | patch file? \-- I enter into root/src/gcc and do svn diff and it doesn't return anything. I am using Debian Etch on x86. SK -- Shakth

Re: cross-gnu toolchain GCC 4.2

2007-12-19 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 08:40:51PM +0530, Shakthi Kannan wrote: > The gcc 4.2 patch gets applied I'm not so sure about that, because... > /home/foo/root/src/gcc/gcc/builtins.def:177: error: 'OPTION_GLIBC' > undeclared (first use in this function) ... this is exactly how it fails if the p

Re: cross-gnu

2007-12-11 Thread Stefan Siegl
Hello Thomas, On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 01:10:13PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 02:12:48AM +0100, I wrote: > > Building the cross glibc and stuff with GCC 4.3 worked, but > > I did not yet test the result. > > I just did some light testing. lib{triv,net,disk}fs seems to

Re: cross-gnu

2007-12-11 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 02:12:48AM +0100, I wrote: > Building the cross glibc and stuff with GCC 4.3 worked, but > I did not yet test the result. I just did some light testing. lib{triv,net,disk}fs seems to work, as well as ext2fs.static, ext2fs and mach-defpager. What doesn't work is pf

Re: cross-gnu

2007-12-10 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 02:55:56PM +0100, I wrote: > On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 01:08:18AM +0100, I wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 01:17:05PM +0100, I wrote: > > > During the next days I'll try to come up with a repository containing the > > > needed patches so that recent versions of GCC

Re: cross-gnu fails

2007-12-08 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 06:54:53PM +, Ashish Gokhale wrote: > I am trying to run cross-gnu script, it fails at.. > > i586-pc-gnu-ar: creating libpthread_pic.a > ++ make prefix=/hurd/sys_root libihash-install > libpthread-install > /usr/bin/install: cannot stat > `/hurd/src/hurd/lib

Re: cross-gnu : mawk syntax error

2007-12-08 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! There is no need to send such email also to the web-hurd mailing list. I've only do so once or twice in the past when the emails contained information I wanted to have integrated into the web or wiki pages. But such technical questions or discussions are fine to be sent just to bug-hurd.

Re: cross-gnu : mawk syntax error

2007-12-07 Thread Ashish Gokhale
7 3:18:40 PM Subject: Re: cross-gnu : mawk syntax error >>>>> "AG" == Ashish Gokhale <<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > writes: [Speaking totally out of my mind.] AG> I am trying to compile the Hurd system for some time now & seem to AG> run int

Re: cross-gnu : mawk syntax error

2007-12-07 Thread Ivan Shmakov
> "AG" == Ashish Gokhale <<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > writes: [Speaking totally out of my mind.] AG> I am trying to compile the Hurd system for some time now & seem to AG> run into problems. I am receiving syntax error for mawk as follows: [...] It may be due to use of some GNU

Re: cross-gnu : mawk syntax error

2007-12-06 Thread Shakthi Kannan
Hi, - On Dec 6, 2007 11:25 PM, Ashish Gokhale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | I am trying to compile the Hurd system for some time \-- 1. How? 2. On which system? SK -- Shakthi Kannan http://www.shakthimaan.com ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@

Re: cross-gnu

2007-11-26 Thread Shakthi Kannan
Hi, - On Nov 25, 2007 9:22 PM, Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | This routinely fails because of some paths being hard-coded (inside the | cross compiler, for example). But I recently read somewhere -- with half | an eye only -- that relocatable GCCs can indeed be built. So, what

Re: cross-gnu

2007-11-25 Thread Shakthi Kannan
Hi, - On 11/25/07, Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | As I write on | : ``The | sources are rooted in `binutils-2_18-branch/src/'.'' \-- I have sorted the path accordingly in the Makefile. - | from the built toolcha

Re: cross-gnu

2007-11-25 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! | maybe it will be nice to get a tarball of the built toolchain, | easy to distribute, compile and test? This routinely fails because of some paths being hard-coded (inside the cross compiler, for example). But I recently read somewhere -- with half an eye only -- that relocatable GCCs

Re: cross-gnu

2007-11-25 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 09:14:28PM +0530, Shakthi Kannan wrote: > Thanks for the code and documentation. I have been able to > successfully build the toolchain on Debian Etch+unstable+testing > (x86). Glad that it works! > I kept the sources in: > .../build/root/src/gnumach >

Re: cross-gnu

2007-11-24 Thread Shakthi Kannan
Hi, I have written a Makefile to automate the toolchain build process. It has been updated to the wiki site: http://www.bddebian.com/~wiki/hurd/building/cross-compiling/ Just do "make" to build the toolchain. You will require an Internet connection, and 1.5 GB of hard-disk space. Feedback welco

Re: cross-gnu

2007-11-23 Thread Shakthi Kannan
Hi, - On 11/19/07, Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | I've done this myself now... \-- Thanks for the code and documentation. I have been able to successfully build the toolchain on Debian Etch+unstable+testing (x86). I kept the sources in: .../build/root/src/gnumach

Re: cross-gnu

2007-11-19 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! Be sure to apply this recently added patch, , to your glibc source tree. On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 01:12:09AM +0100, I wrote: > Ah, and if `configure' files are missing in the sour

Re: cross-gnu

2007-11-17 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 01:08:18AM +0100, I wrote: > On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 01:17:05PM +0100, I wrote: > > During the next days I'll try to come up with a repository containing the > > needed patches so that recent versions of GCC and glibc can be used. > > Finally. Turns out that patchi

Re: cross-gnu

2007-11-16 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at 01:08:18AM +0100, I wrote: > should > contain all the information you need. If you have a fast machine, fast > internet connection and some two or three GiB of hard disk storage to > ``waste'', then plea