Michael Casadevall, le Tue 28 Aug 2007 07:35:32 -0400, a écrit :
> Index: device/blkio.c
> @@ -149,6 +151,10 @@
> do {
> prev = next;
> next = prev->io_next;
> +#ifdef MACH_ENTROPY
> + /* Let's grab the cylinder numbers for entropy. */
> + entropy_putdata
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 08:39:55AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> It could be different if we had a good single entropy source in every
> computer. Unfortunately, entropy devices are a rarity.
That's not true. Intel introduced hardware random number generators in
their chipsets like ten y
Hello!
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 08:39:55AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> [...]
Thanks for these details!
Michael Casadevall: you know what to do?
Regards,
Thomas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
Bug-hurd@gn
At Fri, 20 Jul 2007 18:53:05 +0200,
Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 01:52:39AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > At Thu, 19 Jul 2007 01:40:12 +0200,
> > Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > What do you perceive as the benefit of having the entropy
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 01:52:39AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> What do you perceive as the benefit of having the entropy mixing
> function outside of the device framework in its own user space server?
The very same reasons why we bother with this microkernel stuff at all:
- Reducing me
Hello!
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 01:52:39AM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> At Thu, 19 Jul 2007 01:40:12 +0200,
> Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Can't we come up with something better than putting the mixing machinery
> > into the kernel?
>
> I am not arguing for the mixing to happ
At Thu, 19 Jul 2007 01:40:12 +0200,
Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Uhm, Marcus, I don't really feel like discussing such nuisance, but I'd
> say that as soon as you're putting in new-line breaks (which the GCS and
> our own sanity mandates) you're as well editing in two dimensions, i
Hello!
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 10:53:02PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> At Fri, 13 Jul 2007 22:50:00 -0400,
> Michael Casadevall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jul 13, 2007, at 4:30 AM, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> > /* Sune Kirkeby's entropy patch (which was a port of the
> > * linux entropy
At Fri, 13 Jul 2007 22:50:00 -0400,
Michael Casadevall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> (this is a response to both emails about said patch)
>
> Marcus: I don't think I've ever been nitpicked that badly in my
> life. Congratulations!
I guess
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
(this is a response to both emails about said patch)
Marcus: I don't think I've ever been nitpicked that badly in my
life. Congratulations!
On Jul 13, 2007, at 4:30 AM, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
Hi,
some comments, not in order of importance.
I
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 01:04:01AM -0400, Michael Casadevall wrote:
> + void entropy_putchar(int c) {
[...]
> + if (entropy_write_offset == ENTROPYBUFSIZE) {
> + entropy_write_offset = 0;
> + }
> +
> + if (entropy_write_offset == ENTROPYBUFSIZE) {
> + entropy_write_offset = 0;
>
Hi,
some comments, not in order of importance.
> It also has the patch in the proper format:
Well, I prefer diff -rup, but what the heck.
> AM_CONDITIONAL([enable_kmsg], [false])
I was going to suggest uppercase for automake conditionals, but you
can refer to prior art, so nevermind :)
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
