Samuel Thibault, le Mon 14 Mar 2011 22:49:36 +0100, a écrit :
> > On Mar 13, 2011 5:44 PM, "Samuel Thibault" wrote:
> > > - diskfs_S_dir_lookup is called, which for some reason ends up calling
> > > - fshelp_fetch_root(), which calls
> > > - reauth(), which calls
> > > - mach_reply_port() to get a
> On Mar 13, 2011 5:44 PM, "Samuel Thibault" wrote:
> > - diskfs_S_dir_lookup is called, which for some reason ends up calling
> > - fshelp_fetch_root(), which calls
> > - reauth(), which calls
> > - mach_reply_port() to get a rendez-vous port, and then issues
> > - io_reauthenticate() with that p
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> olafbuddenha...@gmx.net, le Mon 14 Mar 2011 03:21:43 +0100, a écrit :
> > > There, the
> > > rendez-vous port is thus the same as the reply port obtained above,
> > > with the *same name*.
> > > - reauth() destroys the rendez-vous por
olafbuddenha...@gmx.net, le Mon 14 Mar 2011 03:21:43 +0100, a écrit :
> > There, the
> > rendez-vous port is thus the same as the reply port obtained above,
> > with the *same name*.
> > - reauth() destroys the rendez-vous port (and thus the name!)
> > - a bit later, diskfs_S_io_reauthentic
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 01:44:20AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> - diskfs_S_dir_lookup is called, which for some reason ends up calling
> - fshelp_fetch_root(), which calls
> - reauth(), which calls
> - mach_reply_port() to get a rendez-vous port, and then issues
> - io_reauthenticate() wit
I think the second call to reauth should use a second, newly-created,
rendezvous port. Why doesn't it?
Thomas
On Mar 13, 2011 5:44 PM, "Samuel Thibault" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've investigated a duplicate port destroy in ext2fs, what apparently
> happens is this:
>
> - diskfs_S_dir_lookup is calle
