On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Samuel Thibault <samuel.thiba...@gnu.org>wrote:
> olafbuddenha...@gmx.net, le Mon 14 Mar 2011 03:21:43 +0100, a écrit : > > > There, the > > > rendez-vous port is thus the same as the reply port obtained above, > > > with the *same name*. > > > - reauth() destroys the rendez-vous port (and thus the name!) > > > - a bit later, diskfs_S_io_reauthenticate has finished its work, > > > and deallocates its rendez-vous port. But the name doesn't exist > any > > > more. Bad. > > > > I wonder, why is the rendez-vous port actually destroyed, instead of > > just unreferencing the right? > > (using mach_port_deallocate instead of mach_port_destroy indeed seems > to fix the issue, but there may be reasons for destroy rather than > deallocate?) mach_port_destroy : mach_port_deallocate :: exit : free
