Re: Patches: lwip translator

2018-08-11 Thread Joan Lledó
> But could you write the proper ChangeLog entries to explain not only why > the change but also what change is made? See git log and the GNU Coding > Style. The idea is that they help a *lot* when having to dig back what > happened to a given function, to the use of a macro, etc. Of course, here

Re: Patches: lwip translator

2018-08-09 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Joan Lledó, le mar. 07 août 2018 18:02:39 +0200, a ecrit: > Here are some patches for the lwip translator. They solve minor problems I've > found when working on our lwip library. Thanks :) But could you write the proper ChangeLog entries to explain not only why the change but also what

Re: patches for sysvinit (2)

2013-08-28 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Justus Winter, le Thu 15 Aug 2013 09:45:27 +0200, a écrit : > this is my updated patch series for the sysvinit package. Perhaps you should already submit all these patches except [PATCH 4/7] initscripts: add runsystem.sysv which depends on the hurd changes? Samuel

Re: patches for sysvinit, debian repository for testing

2013-07-15 Thread Justus Winter
Quoting Samuel Thibault (2013-07-15 11:18:03) > Hello, > > Justus Winter, le Tue 09 Jul 2013 10:46:43 +0200, a écrit : > > this is a patch series for the sysvinit package. Comments are > > welcome. Patches seven and eight are somewhat questionable, but I'd > > propose the first six for inclusion.

Re: patches for sysvinit, debian repository for testing

2013-07-15 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Justus Winter, le Tue 09 Jul 2013 10:46:43 +0200, a écrit : > this is a patch series for the sysvinit package. Comments are > welcome. Patches seven and eight are somewhat questionable, but I'd > propose the first six for inclusion. Any hints how to send patches to > the sysvinit maintainer

Re: [PATCHES] small autoconf build updates

2013-02-26 Thread Samuel Thibault
Pino Toscano, le Tue 26 Feb 2013 16:14:50 +0100, a écrit : > Do they look okay? May I push them? Please do. Samuel

Re: Patches for libps

2010-08-26 Thread Samuel Thibault
Applied, thanks! Samuel

Re: Patches

2004-09-08 Thread Roland McGrath
I haven't used the savannah patch manager and don't really plan to start thinking about it. If it is useful to people sharing patches before they can be committed, then they can use it however they please. I have mostly ignored its notification emails because they are not easy to read quickly and

Re: Patches

2004-09-08 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
> Please don't post just references to mailing list archives and > expect me to take patches from there. Those are munged and I'm > not going to deal with that. Just repost them. How do you feel about patches in the savannah patch manager? In the past, a fair amount of time has g

Re: Patches for the ppc port

2003-08-14 Thread Barry deFreese
Peter Bruin wrote: Hi, I'm in the process of splitting my changes for the OSF Mach/PowerPC port into multiple patches (one per subdirectory of the Hurd source directory). I'm done with most of the Hurd libraries and a few other subdirectories; the patches, including ChangeLog entries for the fin

Re: Patches for the ppc port

2003-08-14 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 05:55:22PM +0200, Peter Bruin wrote: > subdirectories; the patches, including ChangeLog entries for the > finished patches, are on http://huizen.dds.nl/~pjbruin/hurd/. I could I have committed something equivalent to your fatfs patch, but using and bswap_16/bswap_32 inste

Re: Patches for the ppc port

2003-08-14 Thread Peter Bruin
> Can you split the patches up by features, rather than directories? > For example, all changes to device_open in one patch, etc. > This would be much better to manage and maintain. I agree. > > Almost all changes are between #ifdefs, so applying the patches (at > > least the ones that have Chang

Re: Patches for the ppc port

2003-08-14 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 05:55:22PM +0200, Peter Bruin wrote: > I'm in the process of splitting my changes for the OSF Mach/PowerPC > port into multiple patches (one per subdirectory of the Hurd source > directory). I'm done with most of the Hurd libraries and a few other > subdirectories; the patc

Re: Patches for the Hurd on OSF Mach/PowerPC

2003-06-12 Thread Marco Gerards
Peter Bruin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've put a couple of patches for glibc and the Hurd on > http://huizen.dds.nl/~pjbruin/hurd/, together with a small bit of > explanation. Some of the patches (libc-powerpc.patch, dl-start.S, > {ext2fs,libports,libshouldbeinlibc,libstore}.patch) are reason

Re: Patches for the Hurd on OSF Mach/PowerPC

2003-06-12 Thread ddavies
> "M. Gerards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On what kind of PPCs does it work now? > > As far as I know, only on a certain PowerMac 5500/225 ;-) > > It should work on any PPC which can boot the OSF Mach kernel, i.e. on which > MkLinux runs (and maybe a couple more). You can find the kerne

Re: Patches for the Hurd on OSF Mach/PowerPC

2003-06-12 Thread Peter Bruin
"M. Gerards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On what kind of PPCs does it work now? As far as I know, only on a certain PowerMac 5500/225 ;-) It should work on any PPC which can boot the OSF Mach kernel, i.e. on which MkLinux runs (and maybe a couple more). You can find the kernel on (a mirror o

Re: Patches for the Hurd on OSF Mach/PowerPC

2003-06-12 Thread Jeroen Dekkers
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 04:00:04PM +0200, M. Gerards wrote: > > The ext2 file system uses little-endian order, whereas htons etc. convert > > from > > native to network (big-endian) byte-order. So using htons would give you > > exactly the wrong result. (Actually, I didn't even think of using hto

Re: Patches for the Hurd on OSF Mach/PowerPC

2003-06-12 Thread M. Gerards
> The ext2 file system uses little-endian order, whereas htons etc. convert > from > native to network (big-endian) byte-order. So using htons would give you > exactly the wrong result. (Actually, I didn't even think of using htons, > since > I looked at the Linux code for ext2fs and copied the l

Re: Patches for the Hurd on OSF Mach/PowerPC

2003-06-12 Thread Peter Bruin
Marco Gerards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I had a really quick look at your patches, especially the ext2fs > patch. I have a little (perhaps stupid) question about this patch. I > usually use htons ntos, etc. for handling endianess. Was there a > reason not to use these functions? I'm really happ

Re: Patches for the Hurd on OSF Mach/PowerPC

2003-06-09 Thread Marco Gerards
Peter Bruin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've put a couple of patches for glibc and the Hurd on > http://huizen.dds.nl/~pjbruin/hurd/, together with a small bit of > explanation. Some of the patches (libc-powerpc.patch, dl-start.S, > {ext2fs,libports,libshouldbeinlibc,libstore}.patch) are reason

Re: Patches to GDB to make cross-compile friendly...

2000-02-26 Thread Jeff Bailey
On Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 02:35:37PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote: >That looks fine, though you should match `*-*-gnu*' for the configuration. >Mark Kettenis is in charge of gdb for hurd and will take care of getting >the fix put into gdb. > > It is probably easier to not conditionalize

Re: Patches to GDB to make cross-compile friendly...

2000-02-26 Thread Mark Kettenis
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2000 03:22:21 -0500 From: Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> That looks fine, though you should match `*-*-gnu*' for the configuration. Mark Kettenis is in charge of gdb for hurd and will take care of getting the fix put into gdb. It is probably easier to not con

Re: Patches to GDB to make cross-compile friendly...

2000-02-26 Thread Roland McGrath
That looks fine, though you should match `*-*-gnu*' for the configuration. Mark Kettenis is in charge of gdb for hurd and will take care of getting the fix put into gdb.