> Can you split the patches up by features, rather than directories? > For example, all changes to device_open in one patch, etc. > This would be much better to manage and maintain.
I agree. > > Almost all changes are between #ifdefs, so applying the patches (at > > least the ones that have ChangeLog entries) should be safe for the > > existing code. > > However, probably not the right thing to do :) Depends on the ifdef > though. Sorry, I was being a little overenthusiastic. 8-) > I would like to have the patches in Savannah, because that makes it easy to > see which still need to be applied etc, and all the information about a > patch is in a single place. Please include the changelog entry in the > patch, at the beginning of the patch file, before the actual patch data. > The patch program skips any unformatted text in the patch file, so this is > safe to do and keeps related information together. OK, working on it. Thanks, Peter _______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
