Re: Hurd development

2015-01-18 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hi! On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 15:29:21 +0100, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) wrote: > Justus Winter <4win...@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> skribis: > > Quoting Samuel Thibault (2015-01-16 12:08:07) > >> Also, don't you have commit access to the debian packaging? I guess > >> that's one o

Re: Hurd development

2015-01-16 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Justus Winter <4win...@informatik.uni-hamburg.de> skribis: > Quoting Samuel Thibault (2015-01-16 12:08:07) >> Justus Winter, le Fri 16 Jan 2015 12:01:26 +0100, a écrit : [...] >> Also, don't you have commit access to the debian packaging? I guess >> that's one of the things we must fix. > > No

Re: Hurd development (was: Release process & rolling new releases)

2015-01-16 Thread Justus Winter
Quoting Samuel Thibault (2015-01-16 12:08:07) > Justus Winter, le Fri 16 Jan 2015 12:01:26 +0100, a écrit : > > No it is not. > > You mean in Debian? Yes. > > I have a new server that implements the startup protocol, and it > > neither has a fixed PID nor does it speak the startup protocol over

Re: Hurd development (was: Release process & rolling new releases)

2015-01-16 Thread Samuel Thibault
Justus Winter, le Fri 16 Jan 2015 12:01:26 +0100, a écrit : > No it is not. You mean in Debian? > I have a new server that implements the startup protocol, and it > neither has a fixed PID nor does it speak the startup protocol over > its message port. You mean your recent rewrite of startup in

Re: Hurd development (was: Release process & rolling new releases)

2015-01-16 Thread Justus Winter
Quoting Samuel Thibault (2015-01-16 11:56:14) > Justus Winter, le Fri 16 Jan 2015 11:42:23 +0100, a écrit : > > I have reimplemented the startup server. The new server does not > > support the startup protocol over its message port. This change has > > not made it into the glibc. The shutdown is

Re: Hurd development (was: Release process & rolling new releases)

2015-01-16 Thread Samuel Thibault
Justus Winter, le Fri 16 Jan 2015 11:42:23 +0100, a écrit : > I have reimplemented the startup server. The new server does not > support the startup protocol over its message port. This change has > not made it into the glibc. The shutdown isn't working. AIUI it is working in the Debian libc th

Re: Hurd development (was: Release process & rolling new releases)

2015-01-16 Thread Samuel Thibault
Justus Winter, le Fri 16 Jan 2015 11:42:23 +0100, a écrit : > Our development process is severely broken. Or noone gives a shit > anymore. Or both. I really cannot tell. Possibly part of the former. Definitely not the latter. Personally, I've been unfortunately stuck with various unexpected is

Re: Hurd development advice

2013-09-30 Thread Richard Braun
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 11:52:24PM +0200, Tobias Andersen wrote: > I would say I'm pretty good with the C programming language but I'm not at > all familiar with OS design. > I am interested in networking in particular. Then you'll be interested in the pfinet server of the Hurd, as well as the ne

Re: Hurd development

2011-05-04 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hallo! Meh, for forwarding (moderated) messages from one mailing list to another by using the Mailman web interface, one apparently needs a Judo black belt or something. Now adding back Rick to the recipients' list. or are suitable lists for such questions. On Wed, 04 May 2011 15:28:46 -0400

Re: Hurd development model question

2008-09-24 Thread Thomas Schwinge
[Moved to the mailing list.] Hello! Matthew Ayres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > This might seem odd, but my curiosity was aroused during a conversation > yesterday. I was wondering if someone could tell me what development > lifecycle is used in the Hurd project. I thought perhaps the Waterfall > mo

Re: Hurd development for final bachelor paper

2005-11-07 Thread Asbjørn Andersen
Thanks for quick and great replys! I've got about 5 months, 4 days a week to work on the project. Building a complete working bluetooth stack would be way to much work, but I only need to do some work, and show what I've done. No need to complete a whole stack. Also thanks for the other suggesti

Re: Hurd development for final bachelor paper

2005-11-06 Thread Neal H. Walfield
If you've never implemented a device driver, this project is likely not for you. One piece of background information which you didn't include is how much time you have to work on the project. This is important. I'd guess you don't have enough time to robustly write a blue tooth stack. I'd sugge

Re: Hurd development for final bachelor paper

2005-11-06 Thread Alfred M\. Szmidt
Your question are to general to be given a good answer, so this is the reason why you will get a very short ones. Since communications are my field, I had an idea about starting work on a bluetooth stack for the hurd. Is this kind of work already started? No. Are the hurd even ready