Sergey Bugaev, le ven. 21 avril 2023 00:47:43 +0300, a ecrit:
> You could think of it that way: the
> infrastructure for passing an integer value along with the port is
> still there, but currently no valid flags for it are defined, and so 0
> is always used. We could spell it as
>
> fds[i] = desc
On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 12:14 AM Samuel Thibault
wrote:
> Sergey Bugaev, le lun. 17 avril 2023 16:38:59 +0300, a ecrit:
> > The only valid flag defined here is FD_CLOEXEC. It is of no concern to
> > the receiving process whether or not the sender process wants to close
> > its copy of sent file de
Sergey Bugaev, le lun. 17 avril 2023 16:38:59 +0300, a ecrit:
> The only valid flag defined here is FD_CLOEXEC. It is of no concern to
> the receiving process whether or not the sender process wants to close
> its copy of sent file descriptor upon exec,
Ok, but couldn't there be some flags that we
