Sergey Bugaev, le ven. 21 avril 2023 00:47:43 +0300, a ecrit: > You could think of it that way: the > infrastructure for passing an integer value along with the port is > still there, but currently no valid flags for it are defined, and so 0 > is always used. We could spell it as > > fds[i] = descriptor->flags & ~FD_CLOEXEC; > > if you would prefer;
Yes, I'd prefer. > but that would still always evaluate to 0 (but the compiler wouldn't > be aware and would generate the extra instructions). Yes, sure, but that still looks preferable to me maintenance-wise. Samuel
