Re: /libexec/rc.local...

2004-02-29 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
It's highly questionable if the Hurd package should install an rc file at all. This is a relict from the time where the Hurd used to include everything for a mini-distribution. We have done steps away from it, and will continue to do so. I think that they should be included in the Hu

Re: /libexec/rc.local...

2004-02-28 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
At Fri, 27 Feb 2004 17:47:32 +0100 (MET), ams wrote: > I made this hack so one can install the Hurd without getting screwed > over by /libexec/rc getting overwritten. Now instead of tweaking > /libexec/rc, users can tweak /libexec/rc.local, and still be safe from > a overwritten /libexec/rc. It's

Re: /libexec/rc.local...

2004-02-27 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
I might add that the Debian package could rename its rc file to rc.local, and install that, instead of hacking the usual rc file to load daemons. But I don't use Debian, so I'll leave that for anyone who does. Cheers. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL

Re: /libexec/rc.local...

2004-02-27 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
--- daemons/rc.sh 8 Jun 2001 22:07:18 - 1.23 +++ daemons/rc.sh 27 Feb 2004 16:42:21 - @@ -115,4 +115,9 @@ echo . +echo -n running local commands... The person commiting this patch, please remove the -n before commiting. Sorry for the trouble. +if [