Re: *** SPAM LEVEL 4.448 *** Dynamic linker behaviour difference between Linux, Hurd and FreeBSD

On 05/03/2013 12:11 PM, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote: > On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Simon Richter wrote: > >> I'm writing a small preload library to trace pthread_* calls ... >> In order to find the original function, I use dlsym(RTLD_NEXT, ...) ... > >> In any case, I am wondering if it is actuall

Re: *** SPAM LEVEL 4.448 *** Dynamic linker behaviour difference between Linux, Hurd and FreeBSD

On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Simon Richter wrote: > I'm writing a small preload library to trace pthread_* calls ... > In order to find the original function, I use dlsym(RTLD_NEXT, ...) ... > In any case, I am wondering if it is actually possible to redirect the > pthread_* functions in this

Re: *** SPAM LEVEL 4.448 *** Dynamic linker behaviour difference between Linux, Hurd and FreeBSD

On 05/03/2013 11:11 AM, Simon Richter wrote: > Hi, > > I'm writing a small preload library to trace pthread_* calls, and am > running into a bit of a chicken-and-egg problem. > > In order to find the original function, I use dlsym(RTLD_NEXT, ...) to > look up the symbol on the first invocation. O

Re: ***SPAM*** Re: ***SPAM*** Re: trying to build gnumach.gz

> I guess Fedora does not leave its 32bit libc.a in /usr/lib, and thus > with -nostdlib it won't find it there. You need to pass LDFLAGS which > lead to it. It is, but it's in a separate package called glibc-static that you don't get just by installing glibc-devel.

Re: ***SPAM*** Re: ***SPAM*** Re: trying to build gnumach.gz

Andrew Engelbrecht, le Mon 01 Aug 2011 19:17:39 -0400, a écrit : > On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 18:26:16 -0400, Andrew Engelbrecht wrote: > >configfrag.ac ends like this: > > > ># `${file}' and `$file' have different meanings here with respect to > >having the > ># files in the referenced directory consider

Re: ***SPAM*** Re: trying to build gnumach.gz

On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 18:26:16 -0400, Andrew Engelbrecht wrote: configfrag.ac ends like this: # `${file}' and `$file' have different meanings here with respect to having the # files in the referenced directory considered for `make dist' or not. See #

Re: ***SPAM*** Re: trying to build gnumach.gz

On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 00:15:03 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: Well, the Debian package does it too, but gets config.status: linking ../i386/i386 to machine It's odd that you get this output while the code is AC_CONFIG_LINKS([machine:$systype/$systype mach/machine:$systype/include

Re: ***SPAM*** Re: trying to build gnumach.gz

Andrew Engelbrecht, le Mon 01 Aug 2011 18:07:13 -0400, a écrit : > On Mon, 1 Aug 2011 23:56:03 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > >It should have been done at the end of ./configure (see the > >configfrag.ac file): I'm getting > > > >config.status: linking i386/i386 to machine > >config.status: linkin

Re: spam filtering on the hurdextras lists

Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | 23:59 tschwinge: I was going to make you project admin of hurdextras, > |but you obviously lack the stuff that takes to be a project > admin. > > How did you get to that conclusion? He's Alfred M. Szmidt, the GNU project release manage

Re: spam filtering on the hurdextras lists

On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 01:01:27AM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > If you wish to discuss private things, do it in private. http://web.walfield.org/~deride/%23%23hurd-20060109 says: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]:43> tschwinge is a complete and utter dickhead. Insulting people on a public IRC channel hardly

Re: spam filtering on the hurdextras lists

Thank you for once again confirming my decision, now I am sure I did the right thing in not making you a project administrator of HurdExtras. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

Re: spam filtering on the hurdextras lists

If you wish to discuss private things, do it in private. This is my last mail on this topic, I have better things to do, like removing the lint between my toes. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: spam]

Hi Marcus > thanks for setting this up and clearing the queues. You deliver the > tins, we bring you the spam! ;) It always seems like everyone has so much spam they are always willing to share. :-) > Okie. I added a moderator. Who or what is the mail manager you added > in the moderator ema

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: spam]

Hi Bob, thanks for setting this up and clearing the queues. You deliver the tins, we bring you the spam! ;) At Sun, 25 Sep 2005 12:04:01 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) wrote: > Messages from non-subscribers who have never posted to the list before > will be held for human review. Those g

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: spam]

Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > Bob, could you setup the needed magic for the following lists: > > bug-hurd@gnu.org > help-hurd@gnu.org > web-hurd@gnu.org All done. I finished the configuration changes for the last two just a little bit ago. What this means to the mailing list: Messages from subscri

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: spam]

Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > Bob, could you setup the needed magic for the following lists: Sure. I would be happy to set that up for you. > bug-hurd@gnu.org > help-hurd@gnu.org > web-hurd@gnu.org Oh my, there is a lot of spam in the hold queues there. I am actually on a short trip at the moment t

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: spam]

Great! Thanks a lot Bob. I might note that Thomas (Scwhinge) voluenteered in helping with filtering mail that needed human attention. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: spam]

Bob, could you setup the needed magic for the following lists: bug-hurd@gnu.org help-hurd@gnu.org web-hurd@gnu.org Do you need any permisions changed so you can set this all up? l4-hurd@gnu.org would also be nice to add, but I'd like to raise it with people on that list first before anything is

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: spam]

ed to be reviewed manually. Below, I re-quoted the proposal, if someone wants to re-view it again. Regards, Thomas > --- Start of forwarded message --- > Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 11:45:21 -0600 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) > Subject: R

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: spam]

Hi, "Alfred M\. Szmidt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What do people think about the following to reduce spam on bug-hurd > and help-hurd? It won't clean up the old archives, but it will clean > up future archives and might shut some people up that have been > voicing their opinion about spam to

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: spam]

At Fri, 16 Sep 2005 21:00:46 +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > > What do people think about the following to reduce spam on bug-hurd > and help-hurd? It won't clean up the old archives, but it will clean > up future archives and might shut some people up that have been > voicing their opinion abou

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: spam]

ssage --- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 11:45:21 -0600 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) Subject: Re: spam Simon Josefsson wrote: > Hi all. How do people handle spam to [EMAIL PROTECTED] addresses? I am helping with a number of the bug lists. A small number of us including

Re: Spam on bug-hurd.

On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 05:57:22PM -0400, Deven T. Corzine wrote: > Could messages from non-subscribers be quarantined for a moderator to > filter manually? That way, people wouldn't have to subscribe to send > one message (though it would be delayed), yet subscribers could still > post directl

Re: Spam on bug-hurd.

Could messages from non-subscribers be quarantined for a moderator to filter manually? That way, people wouldn't have to subscribe to send one message (though it would be delayed), yet subscribers could still post directly while being protected from receiving spam through the list... Deven __

Re: Spam on bug-hurd.

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, What is with all the spam on this mailing list? Am I the only one getting it? Is this mailing list not subscriber post only...? Maybe it should be. All the spam sure makes it hard to decipher the real emails. Thanks. __ Donnie Spamassasin, properly configured with

Re: Spam on bug-hurd.

On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 09:53:42AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > What is with all the spam on this mailing list? > Am I the only one getting it? Please read the mailing list archives for the numerous prior discussions about this issue. If you have something /genuinely new/ to add, do so after

Re: spam

we need to do something regarding the junk that arrived using BCC features, I'm atleast fine by that, since there is no good reason to post to a mailing list using BCC. But as I already noted, it won't do much difference from the looks, so it probobly isn't worth it. But shurg... I still t

RE: spam

e with you...Always." Obi-Wan Kenobi "Use the Force, Luke."  Obi-Wan Kenobi > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bug-hurd- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marco Gerards > Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 6:20 PM > To: Chris Kerr > Cc: Bug-

RE: spam

ke."  Obi-Wan Kenobi > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bug-hurd- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alfred M. Szmidt > Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 1:24 PM > To: Gregg C Levine > Cc: Bug-hurd@gnu.org > Subject: Re: spam > >First stop

Re: spam

Ognyan Kulev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Dmitriy Tochansky wrote: >> Why are there so much spam?! > > Because anyone can post to GNU mailing lists without being > subscribed (to ease asking questions), and there are no spam > filters on the GNU servers. It's expected that subscribers will > do f

Re: spam

Well, there are spam filters on GNU servers. Spam filters as in tagging/removing mail automaticly, ala spamassasin. Moderators don't count. (The GNU machines run spam filtering on non-list mails, but they don't run it at all on mailing lists to my knowledge, nor do I think it is possible to ena

Re: spam

Chris Kerr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > "there are no spam filters on GNU servers" > Is it possible to change this? Not by asking on this list, is my observation. Asking about it is only irritating for people who are subscribed. Could you contact the FSF system administrators if you care? :)

Re: spam

Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: BTW Isn't this question for the FAQ? ;-) Great idea! And thanks for the answer to the question. ?? Why is there so much on bug-hurd/help-hurd? {OK} Because anyone can post to GNU mailing lists without being subscribed (to ease asking questions), and there are no spam fil

Re: spam

"there are no spam filters on GNU servers" Is it possible to change this? There are several problems with running spam filters (either only tagging, or deleting mail that might be spam) on mailing lists. But they are better discuess on a forum for that kind of stuff. If you are interested

Re: spam

"there are no spam filters on GNU servers" Is it possible to change this? --- Ognyan Kulev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dmitriy Tochansky wrote: > > Why are there so much spam?! > > Because anyone can post to GNU mailing lists without > being subscribed > (to ease asking questions), and there

Re: spam

BTW Isn't this question for the FAQ? ;-) Great idea! And thanks for the answer to the question. ?? Why is there so much on bug-hurd/help-hurd? {OK} Because anyone can post to GNU mailing lists without being subscribed (to ease asking questions), and there are no spam filters on the GNU serve

Re: spam

Dmitriy Tochansky wrote: Why are there so much spam?! Because anyone can post to GNU mailing lists without being subscribed (to ease asking questions), and there are no spam filters on the GNU servers. It's expected that subscribers will do filtering on their side (Junk Control in Mozilla *, et

Re: spam

First stop taking my mail out of context. I didn't take it out of context. Russia is a huge country, "that part of the world" means essentially anything from Europe, Asia, USA or the North Pole and probobly more places that just don't pop into my mind at this moment.

RE: spam

Force will be with you...Always." Obi-Wan Kenobi "Use the Force, Luke."  Obi-Wan Kenobi > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bug-hurd- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alfred M. Szmidt > Sent: Monday, January 24, 2005 12:51 PM > To: Gregg C Lev

Re: spam

Starting about a year and a half earlier, something caused a large volume of junk mail in one of the languages spoken in your part of the world to land on us. Oh, you mean that place that is "the protectors of freedom and democracy" right? (Russia just happens to be in that "part of the

RE: spam

Hello from Gregg C Levine Where do you want me to start? Starting about a year and a half earlier, something caused a large volume of junk mail in one of the languages spoken in your part of the world to land on us. To my knowledge some of it is being sent out directly by a malicious individual who

Re: [SPAM] braniff

>Joyce,! > >Need affordable but reliable web hosting for only $5/month? $5.95 is much more than $5. Not if it is 5 USD vs. 5.95 AUD (which is around 4.1 USD). ___ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinf

Re: [SPAM] braniff

Viola wrote: Joyce,! Need affordable but reliable web hosting for only $5/month? $5.95 is much more than $5. Paul Scott ___ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

Re: spam everywhere

On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 01:27:05PM +, Jose Eugenio Marchesi wrote: There should be RBL headers if you choose to ignore SPAM. GNU doesn't filter mailing lists at all per policy, but we attempt to tag spam so that the end use can filter as (s)he sees fit. > > uff, my anti-spam filters brea

Re: spam: we should talk...

I've noticed there is more spam on bug-hurd and help-hurd than on any other list I am subscribed to. Maybe moderating any messages that don't have [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the To: or the CC: would solve most of the problem. I suppose they are working on propietary software. Anette Nordvall wrote: >