On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 12:32 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Thu 21 Apr 2011 12:21:38 +0200, a écrit :
> > On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 09:38 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> >
> > > I built it as root and the as user with the new fakeroot 1.11.5.1.
> > > That's what I meant. I will build
Svante Signell, le Thu 21 Apr 2011 12:21:38 +0200, a écrit :
> On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 09:38 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
>
> > I built it as root and the as user with the new fakeroot 1.11.5.1.
> > That's what I meant. I will build as user again just to be sure.
>
> Confirmed, it builds fine as un
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 09:38 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> I built it as root and the as user with the new fakeroot 1.11.5.1.
> That's what I meant. I will build as user again just to be sure.
Confirmed, it builds fine as under with the latest fakeroot installed.
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 00:43 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Thu 21 Apr 2011 00:39:28 +0200, a écrit :
> > On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 19:22 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Svante Signell, le Wed 13 Apr 2011 16:14:54 +0200, a écrit :
> > > > On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 12:52 +0200, Svante
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 19:22 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Wed 13 Apr 2011 16:14:54 +0200, a écrit :
> > On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 12:52 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 11:37 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> >
> > > Success: lapack builds perfectly as root.
Svante Signell, le Thu 21 Apr 2011 00:39:28 +0200, a écrit :
> On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 19:22 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Svante Signell, le Wed 13 Apr 2011 16:14:54 +0200, a écrit :
> > > On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 12:52 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 11:37 +0200, Samuel
Samuel Thibault, le Thu 14 Apr 2011 13:47:47 +0200, a écrit :
> You probably need to use the non-intrusive option which prevents gdb
> from stopping the process. (else all pipes & such stop working, yes).
I meant
(gdb) set noninvasive
of course
Samuel
Svante Signell, le Thu 14 Apr 2011 13:38:16 +0200, a écrit :
> On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 19:22 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Svante Signell, le Wed 13 Apr 2011 16:14:54 +0200, a écrit :
> ...
> > > Failure: The ghc6 build hangs at the same place also as root (and with
> > > the timer watchdog disab
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 19:22 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Wed 13 Apr 2011 16:14:54 +0200, a écrit :
...
> > Failure: The ghc6 build hangs at the same place also as root (and with
> > the timer watchdog disabled). What to do next??
>
> Run gdb on the pflocal process to check ou
Svante Signell, le Thu 14 Apr 2011 13:22:55 +0200, a écrit :
> On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 13:12 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Svante Signell, le Thu 14 Apr 2011 13:06:33 +0200, a écrit :
> > > On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 23:22 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > > Svante Signell, le Wed 13 Apr 2011 20:48:
On Thu, 2011-04-14 at 13:12 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Thu 14 Apr 2011 13:06:33 +0200, a écrit :
> > On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 23:22 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Svante Signell, le Wed 13 Apr 2011 20:48:30 +0200, a écrit :
> > > > voila, it worked! If you want I can make
Svante Signell, le Thu 14 Apr 2011 13:06:33 +0200, a écrit :
> On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 23:22 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Svante Signell, le Wed 13 Apr 2011 20:48:30 +0200, a écrit :
> > > voila, it worked! If you want I can make a patch disabling the sysv
> > > checks (or even the whole build o
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 23:22 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Wed 13 Apr 2011 20:48:30 +0200, a écrit :
> > voila, it worked! If you want I can make a patch disabling the sysv
> > checks (or even the whole build of libfakeroot-sysv.so) and send a bug
> > report to the Debian BTS.
>
Svante Signell, le Thu 14 Apr 2011 01:25:35 +0200, a écrit :
> Looks like lapack has disappeared from the buildd queue.
It hasn't disappeared, I had given it back.
Samuel
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 20:05 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Wed 13 Apr 2011 15:13:32 +0200, a écrit :
> > On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 13:34 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Svante Signell, le Wed 13 Apr 2011 12:52:10 +0200, a écrit :
> > > > BTW: Why does the build fail on the build
Svante Signell, le Wed 13 Apr 2011 20:48:30 +0200, a écrit :
> voila, it worked! If you want I can make a patch disabling the sysv
> checks (or even the whole build of libfakeroot-sysv.so) and send a bug
> report to the Debian BTS.
Disabling the sysv backend is not needed: we can build the package
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 12:52 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 11:37 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Svante Signell, le Wed 13 Apr 2011 11:28:34 +0200, a écrit :
>
> > > libfakeroot: read: Connection reset by peer
> >
> > Also, you should probably check how things work when no
Svante Signell, le Wed 13 Apr 2011 15:13:32 +0200, a écrit :
> On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 13:34 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Svante Signell, le Wed 13 Apr 2011 12:52:10 +0200, a écrit :
> > > BTW: Why does the build fail on the buildds? I thought the builds was
> > > made with root permission.
> >
Svante Signell, le Wed 13 Apr 2011 16:14:54 +0200, a écrit :
> On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 12:52 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 11:37 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > Success: lapack builds perfectly as root. The problems are probably
> > caused by {lib}fakeroot. I'll try to b
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 12:52 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 11:37 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Success: lapack builds perfectly as root. The problems are probably
> caused by {lib}fakeroot. I'll try to build ghc6 as root too to see if
> the problems there are also caused by
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 13:34 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Wed 13 Apr 2011 12:52:10 +0200, a écrit :
> > BTW: Why does the build fail on the buildds? I thought the builds was
> > made with root permission.
>
> Nope, they're not.
Any idea how many packages failing to build due
Svante Signell, le Wed 13 Apr 2011 12:52:10 +0200, a écrit :
> BTW: Why does the build fail on the buildds? I thought the builds was
> made with root permission.
Nope, they're not.
Samuel
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 11:37 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Wed 13 Apr 2011 11:28:34 +0200, a écrit :
> > libfakeroot: read: Connection reset by peer
>
> Also, you should probably check how things work when not using fakeroot,
> i.e. when the build already runs as root. Maybe l
Svante Signell, le Wed 13 Apr 2011 11:28:34 +0200, a écrit :
> On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 11:10 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Svante Signell, le Wed 13 Apr 2011 11:05:30 +0200, a écrit :
> > > On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 10:43 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > > Svante Signell, le Wed 13 Apr 2011 07:46:
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 11:10 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Wed 13 Apr 2011 11:05:30 +0200, a écrit :
> > On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 10:43 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > Svante Signell, le Wed 13 Apr 2011 07:46:54 +0200, a écrit :
> > > > make[1]: *** [lapack_testing] Error 141
>
Svante Signell, le Wed 13 Apr 2011 11:05:30 +0200, a écrit :
> On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 10:43 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Svante Signell, le Wed 13 Apr 2011 07:46:54 +0200, a écrit :
> > > make[1]: *** [lapack_testing] Error 141
> > >
> > > Both tests end with a signal being sent for a kill fro
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 10:43 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Svante Signell, le Wed 13 Apr 2011 07:46:54 +0200, a écrit :
> > make[1]: *** [lapack_testing] Error 141
> >
> > Both tests end with a signal being sent for a kill from fakeroot in the
> > first case and in libfakreoot during a read opera
Svante Signell, le Wed 13 Apr 2011 07:46:54 +0200, a écrit :
> make[1]: *** [lapack_testing] Error 141
>
> Both tests end with a signal being sent for a kill from fakeroot in the
> first case and in libfakreoot during a read operation. Both had happen
> during redirection of stdin and stdout. Why
Hi,
looking at the build log of the for a long time build-attempted lapack
from bach.debian.net and my own build trial, my build progressed a much
longer in the tests than on bach. However, both builds ended strangely:
qemu-kvm: (during linking)
gfortran schkrfp.o sdrvrfp.o sdrvrf1.o sdrvrf2.o
29 matches
Mail list logo