On Fri, 2002-11-22 at 06:40, Robert Millan wrote:
> > This is in fact two bugs: First, glibc headers need to define those symbols,
> > irregardless where they are implemented and supported or not. So please
> > file a bug against glibc. It would be nice to include all missing symbols
> > from te
On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 06:29:13PM +0100, Marcus Brinkmann wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 11:45:18AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > But the bits about OCRNL, TABDLY and TAB3 seems to be wrong. They're
> > > all required by POSIX.
> >
> > I didn't know that. Well, in any case they're features
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 11:45:18AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > But the bits about OCRNL, TABDLY and TAB3 seems to be wrong. They're
> > all required by POSIX.
>
> I didn't know that. Well, in any case they're features we don't have
> yet. When they are implemented the code will recompile with
On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 09:28:21PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 07:11:04PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > Package: netkit-rsh
> > Severity: important
> > Tags: patch sid
> >
> > The attached patch fixes netkit-rsh to build on GNU.
>
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> But the bits
