Thanks. I've put the fix in, done slightly differently. Your change
introduced a new bug because it didn't make sure the buffer was large
enough to hold the trailing slash. (Also, strcat makes me cringe.)
I don't recall what the state of the whole trailing slash question was last
time we went
Moritz Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, hmm, is there anything wrong with that patch? Please tell me if
> that is the case, so that I can fix it.
Um, well, the behavior you see is certainly inconsistent. But one
problem here is that the user-level behavior is *always* supposed to
be to
Hi, hmm, is there anything wrong with that patch? Please tell me if
that is the case, so that I can fix it.
moritz
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://duesseldorf.ccc.de/~moritz/
GPG fingerprint = 3A14 3923 15BE FD57 FC06 B501 0841 2D7B 6F98 4199
_
Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A patch without a bug report is almost always ignored.
Sorry, I thought it was obvious, since it's a little change.
Here the bug, now in verbose mode:
moritz@hurd:~$ touch foo
moritz@hurd:~$ ln -s foo foo2
moritz@hurd:~$ ln -s $PWD/foo foo3
moritz@h
A patch without a bug report is almost always ignored.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
Moritz Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> 2001-12-03 Moritz Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * libdiskfs/dir-lookup.c (diskfs_S_dir_lookup): Don't forget
> the trailing slash when looking up absolute symlinks.
>
> --- dir-lookup.c.orig Mon Dec 3 17:35:09 2001
> +++
Hi,
2001-12-03 Moritz Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* libdiskfs/dir-lookup.c (diskfs_S_dir_lookup): Don't forget
the trailing slash when looking up absolute symlinks.
--- dir-lookup.c.orig Mon Dec 3 17:35:09 2001
+++ dir-lookup.cMon Dec 3 17:36:04 2001
@@ -361,6 +3
