Re: /libexec/rc.local...

2004-02-29 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
It's highly questionable if the Hurd package should install an rc file at all. This is a relict from the time where the Hurd used to include everything for a mini-distribution. We have done steps away from it, and will continue to do so. I think that they should be included in the Hu

Re: /libexec/rc.local...

2004-02-28 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
At Fri, 27 Feb 2004 17:47:32 +0100 (MET), ams wrote: > I made this hack so one can install the Hurd without getting screwed > over by /libexec/rc getting overwritten. Now instead of tweaking > /libexec/rc, users can tweak /libexec/rc.local, and still be safe from > a overwritten

Re: /libexec/rc.local...

2004-02-27 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
I might add that the Debian package could rename its rc file to rc.local, and install that, instead of hacking the usual rc file to load daemons. But I don't use Debian, so I'll leave that for anyone who does. Cheers. ___ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL

Re: /libexec/rc.local...

2004-02-27 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
[ -r /libexec/rc.local ]; then + source /libexec/rc.local +fi + date ___ Bug-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd

/libexec/rc.local...

2004-02-27 Thread Alfred M. Szmidt
Hey, I made this hack so one can install the Hurd without getting screwed over by /libexec/rc getting overwritten. Now instead of tweaking /libexec/rc, users can tweak /libexec/rc.local, and still be safe from a overwritten /libexec/rc. Cheers. 2004-02-27 Alfred M. Szmidt <[EMAIL PROTEC