Re: gnumach 1.3 + gcc 3.3

2004-02-26 Thread Paolo Dongilli
Eric Olinger wrote: On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:59:47 +0100 Paolo Dongilli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I checked out the gnumach-1-branch but there are still problems with the latest version of autoconf 2.59 :( I ran into the same problem when making the ebuild for the gnumach 1 branch. Check ou

Re: gnumach 1.3 + gcc 3.3

2004-02-26 Thread Paolo Dongilli
Eric Olinger wrote: On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:59:47 +0100 Paolo Dongilli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I checked out the gnumach-1-branch but there are still problems with the latest version of autoconf 2.59 :( I ran into the same problem when making the ebuild for the gnumach 1 branch. Check ou

Re: gnumach 1.3 + gcc 3.3

2004-02-25 Thread Paolo Dongilli
Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > You shouldn't need to apply it to build GNU Mach, unless you need > to poke around in any files that are used to generate > configure/Makefile.in/etc. But during the make process, autoconf is called. Why? No idea, sounds like they are out-of-sync in some way,

Re: gnumach 1.3 + gcc 3.3

2004-02-25 Thread Paolo Dongilli
Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: Marco posted an autoconf patch for GNU Mach 1.x a while ago, which still awaits approval (if I remember correctly). Since Savannah doesn't send updates to the lists, I guess nobody has seen this yet, I have attached Marco's patch. I think I had to apply it in orde