Eric Olinger wrote:
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:59:47 +0100
Paolo Dongilli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I checked out the gnumach-1-branch but there are still problems with
the latest version of autoconf 2.59 :(
I ran into the same problem when making the ebuild for the gnumach 1 branch. Check
ou
Eric Olinger wrote:
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:59:47 +0100
Paolo Dongilli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I checked out the gnumach-1-branch but there are still problems with
the latest version of autoconf 2.59 :(
I ran into the same problem when making the ebuild for the gnumach 1 branch. Check
ou
Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> You shouldn't need to apply it to build GNU Mach, unless you need
> to poke around in any files that are used to generate
> configure/Makefile.in/etc.
But during the make process, autoconf is called. Why?
No idea, sounds like they are out-of-sync in some way,
Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
Marco posted an autoconf patch for GNU Mach 1.x a while ago, which still
awaits approval (if I remember correctly).
Since Savannah doesn't send updates to the lists, I guess nobody has
seen this yet, I have attached Marco's patch.
I think I had to apply it in orde