On 14/05/2023 7:01 am, jbranso wrote:
May 13, 2023 1:46 PM, "Sergey Bugaev" wrote:
On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 7:38 PM jbranso wrote:
+Hurd developers are adding 64-bit support, and they plan to drop the
+32-bit support, once the 64-bit support is deemed stable.
Is this really the plan? :(
Has
May 13, 2023 1:46 PM, "Sergey Bugaev" wrote:
> On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 7:38 PM jbra...@dismail.de wrote:
>
>> +Hurd developers are adding 64-bit support, and they plan to drop the
>> +32-bit support, once the 64-bit support is deemed stable.
>
> Is this really the plan? :(
>
> Has this been d
On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 7:38 PM jbra...@dismail.de wrote:
> +Hurd developers are adding 64-bit support, and they plan to drop the
> +32-bit support, once the 64-bit support is deemed stable.
Is this really the plan? :(
Has this been discussed anywhere?
I understand that supporting multiple arch
On May 13, 2023 6:38:15 PM GMT+02:00, "jbra...@dismail.de"
wrote:
>---
> faq/64-bit.mdwn | 11 ---
> open_issues/64-bit_port.mdwn | 6 +-
> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/faq/64-bit.mdwn b/faq/64-bit.mdwn
>index 2e1278cb..36afbbc3 100644
---
faq/64-bit.mdwn | 11 ---
open_issues/64-bit_port.mdwn | 6 +-
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/faq/64-bit.mdwn b/faq/64-bit.mdwn
index 2e1278cb..36afbbc3 100644
--- a/faq/64-bit.mdwn
+++ b/faq/64-bit.mdwn
@@ -13,11 +13,8 @@ License|/fdl
Hi,
On Sat, May 13, 2023, 04:01 wrote:
>
> Forgive me for asking the dumb question...
>
> is the current 64-bit port for both the kernel and userland?
Yes :)
> If yes, then I will submit a patch soon to remove this paragraph from the wiki
>
> There are currently no plans for 64-bit userlan
