On May 13, 2023 6:38:15 PM GMT+02:00, "jbra...@dismail.de" <jbra...@dismail.de> wrote: >--- > faq/64-bit.mdwn | 11 ++++------- > open_issues/64-bit_port.mdwn | 6 +----- > 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > >diff --git a/faq/64-bit.mdwn b/faq/64-bit.mdwn >index 2e1278cb..36afbbc3 100644 >--- a/faq/64-bit.mdwn >+++ b/faq/64-bit.mdwn >@@ -13,11 +13,8 @@ License|/fdl]]."]]"""]] > > [[!meta title="Is there a 64-bit version?"]] > >-There are currently no plan for 64-bit userland for the short term, but there >-are plans for 64-bit kernelland with 32-bit userland, which will notably >permit >-to efficiently make use of more than 2 GiB memory and provide 4 GiB userland >-addressing space. The kernel support was merged into GNU Mach, the currently >-missing bit is the 32/64 mig translation for kernel RPCs. >+Hurd developers are adding 64-bit support, and they plan to drop the >+32-bit support, once the 64-bit support is deemed stable. I don't think anyone told the drop of 32 bit support >+ >+ > >-That being said, you can always run a 32-bit version on a 64-bit machine, it >-just works, processes are just limited to a couple GiB available memory. >diff --git a/open_issues/64-bit_port.mdwn b/open_issues/64-bit_port.mdwn >index 95761828..2cb77d90 100644 >--- a/open_issues/64-bit_port.mdwn >+++ b/open_issues/64-bit_port.mdwn >@@ -13,11 +13,7 @@ License|/fdl]]."]]"""]] > > [[!inline pages="title(Is there a 64-bit version?)" feeds="no" raw="yes"]] > >-**What is left for initial support (32-on-64) is** >- >- * Fixing bugs :) >- >-**For pure 64bit support, we need to** >+**For 64bit support, we need to** > > * Fix bugs :) > * bootstrap a distrib
Hello,
