Re: chroot sockets

2011-06-18 Thread Samuel Thibault
olafbuddenha...@gmx.net, le Fri 17 Jun 2011 23:19:15 +0200, a écrit : > On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 10:40:03AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > olafbuddenha...@gmx.net, le Thu 02 Jun 2011 04:13:34 +0200, a écrit : > > > > Err... What's the use of sharing the pipe server between chroot and > > > main

Re: chroot sockets

2011-06-18 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 10:40:03AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > olafbuddenha...@gmx.net, le Thu 02 Jun 2011 04:13:34 +0200, a écrit : > > Err... What's the use of sharing the pipe server between chroot and > > main system? > > So that named pipes can actually work. Why wouldn't they work

Re: chroot sockets

2011-06-18 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 08:49:02PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > Cheroot isn't supposed to change the namespace of Unix domain sockets > in the case where the chroot shares a file with the main system. OK, that makes sense... I wonder though whether that's relevant in the use case at