olafbuddenha...@gmx.net, le Fri 17 Jun 2011 23:19:15 +0200, a écrit : > On Fri, Jun 03, 2011 at 10:40:03AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > olafbuddenha...@gmx.net, le Thu 02 Jun 2011 04:13:34 +0200, a écrit : > > > > Err... What's the use of sharing the pipe server between chroot and > > > main system? > > > > So that named pipes can actually work. > > Why wouldn't they work if the chroot uses a separate pipe server? AIUI > it will only prevent pipes *between* the two environments, but not > within it... > > > /tmp and /var/run and things like that also need to be firmlinked. > > Else the rendez-vous between pflocal and libc doesn't work. > > What rendez-vous?
Honestly I don't remember all the details and don't want to dive into it again, but be sure that there *is* an issue, else I wouldn't have tinkered with this. It must be something like: the separate pipe server is not chrooted, and thus looks for the rendez-vous (see pipe code, I'm afraid I'm too lazy to work out the details again just to explain them) in the non-chrooted filesystem. Samuel
