Hi,
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 06:17:55PM +0300, marius adrian popa wrote:
> I have made my proposal to haikuos for the moment
> http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2011/mariuz/1
> I don't know too much about the hurd internals (only about haiku,
> linux) In the porting for
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 12:03:12PM +0200, Sergio Lopez wrote:
> El Sun, 27 Mar 2011 12:06:03 +0200 escribió:
> > On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 01:47:09PM +0100, Sergio Lopez wrote:
> > > I think all of them were applied, except the ones that alter
> > > default_pager's interface to accept only the
Patrik Olsson, le Fri 08 Apr 2011 12:39:25 +0200, a écrit :
> Submit where? Upstream or to Debian Alioth or ...?
Good question.
Submitting to the Debian bugtracker only would make maintainers have
to forward upstream. Forwarding upstream is more perenial, but only
upstream would make the patch ap
olafbuddenha...@gmx.net, le Fri 08 Apr 2011 19:26:27 +0200, a écrit :
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 01:24:25AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > In that particular case, libsepol, the package is actually expected to
> > be used on Linux only, so it's probably fine. Now, since it's actually
> > Linux
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 12:31:57PM +0200, Patrik Olsson wrote:
> On 07/04/11 21:42, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> > A general remark: not all plattforms have asprintf(). Depending on
> > how portable the packages in question are, you might need to add
> > configure-time checks and/or compi
Hallo,
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 01:24:25AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> In that particular case, libsepol, the package is actually expected to
> be used on Linux only, so it's probably fine. Now, since it's actually
> Linux-only, it's probably also not really useful to port this one...
Well, i
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 04:21:26AM +0200, arne_...@web.de wrote:
> switch license to GPLv3 so we can include files under Apache 2.0. For
> details, see: http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html
That's way to long for a Patch title. Move the second sentence to the
body of the co
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 04:21:25AM +0200, arne_...@web.de wrote:
> This patch makes pyhurd build again under cython 0.14.1.
OK. I'm not sure why you Cc:ed it to me though... I don't even speak
Python :-)
You should rather Cc: it to Anatoly, who will (hopefully) be your
mentor...
> It is qu
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 11:40:56PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> I thought free(NULL) wasn't safe and led to crashes, but you're right
> according to free(3).
It's amazing how many programmers are not aware of that :-) It's one of
the most frequent things I tend to point out in patc
El Sun, 27 Mar 2011 12:06:03 +0200
escribió:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 01:47:09PM +0100, Sergio Lopez wrote:
>
> > I think all of them were applied, except the ones that alter
> > default_pager's interface to accept only the creation of objects
> > with an initial internal size of 4K.
>
I have made my proposal to haikuos for the moment
http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2011/mariuz/1
I don't know too much about the hurd internals (only about haiku, linux)
In the porting for haikuos my guess is that some of the layers could
be ported to hurd too
On 08/04/11 01:24, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Could you rather look at the top of this page?
>
> http://people.debian.org/~sthibault/graph-total-top.txt
>
> This is what is mostly needed. A lot of them will however not be
> trivial so you'll have to sort it out a bit by checking what kind of
> fail
Hello,
On 07/04/11 21:42, olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
>
> A general remark: not all plattforms have asprintf(). Depending on how
> portable the packages in question are, you might need to add
> configure-time checks and/or compile-time conditionals.
>
I am aware of that, but from what I coul
13 matches
Mail list logo
