Hi,
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 01:37:12PM +0100, Michael Walker wrote:
> The below patch monitors the backing store for changes (if it's a
> separate file rather than the underlying node) and updates the
> presented directory hierarchy when a change is detected.
I'm not familiar with the notificati
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 02:10:33AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Michael S. Walker, le Sun 03 Apr 2011 00:30:32 +0100, a écrit :
> > What's the correct way to produce a patch? I'm using git for version
> > control (if that's relevant).
>
> Then git diff.
No, git format-patch is much better.
-
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 09:50:50PM +0300, Esa-Matti Mourujärvi wrote:
> > Oh... That might be a problem. This level of C understanding will
> > probably be required to successfully complete this task...
>
> Maybe we got to a wrong foot here. I will try to rephrase: I am
> familiar with C's p
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 12:30:32AM +0100, Michael S. Walker wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 19:41:28 +0200 wrote:
> > > * Support for XSLT transformations
> >
> > Not sure how that would fit?...
>
> It was an idea proposed in the TODO file, though that might be better
> as a separate transla
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 12:38:19PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Of course I already had updated the pages after you and I had done our
> this year's updates.
I misread your message: you mentioned "weeks", and somehow I read it as
"it hasn't been updated for weeks"... Sorry.
-antrik-
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 11:53:04PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Olaf surely will already be drafting the email to introduce you to the
> proper Git patch submissing wonders (short: have a local branch, better
> yet, a separte branch per topic, commit logically independent patches in
> ther
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 10:55:57AM +0100, Michael Dorrington wrote:
> olafbuddenha...@gmx.net wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:15:21AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> >> Why not plain .html?
> >
> > HTML was never meant to be writte by hand.
>
> Never?
Right.
I'm not sure where exactl
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 08:09:27PM +0530, neeraj nayal wrote:
> i want to work on GCC.
You clearly got the wrong mailing list...
-antrik-
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 01:35:21PM +0100, Michael Walker wrote:
> The below patch fixes all compiler warnings.
Nice :-)
> It's quite long as I use a lot of warning flags (habit from when I was
> working on my own kernel project):
It would be best if you could split it up into a series of p
Hello!
I can confirm that ‘make dist’ works like a charm:
http://hydra.nixos.org/job/gnu/hurd-master/tarball
The latest tarball can be obtained from:
http://hydra.nixos.org/job/gnu/hurd-master/tarball/latest
Thanks,
Ludo’.
On 04/05/2011 12:14 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Marcus, is the g10 Code Hurd Maintenance Point offering still
> appropriate?
That one is stale. Maybe something could be arranged if there is interest.
> Hurd developers, please talk to me or add yourself to that page if you
> feel like you should
11 matches
Mail list logo
