Re: [PATCH 3/4] Set an appropriate st_mode on symlinks.

On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 07:05:14PM +0200, Jeremie Koenig wrote: > + stat.st_size = strlen (symlink_target) : 0; whoops -- Jeremie Koenig http://jk.fr.eu.org

Re: [PATCH 8/9] Fix "make dist" in `pfinet'

Hi! Samuel Thibault writes: > Ludovic Courtès, le Sat 17 Jul 2010 16:44:08 +0200, a écrit : >> This patch isn’t perfect in that stale ‘.o’ files or similar in the >> ‘linux-src’ and ‘glue-include’ directories would end up in the tarball. >> However, doing it the Right Way is somewhat tedious, >

Re: What do you need from the Hurd for your day-to-day tasks?

Hi, On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 05:24:24PM +0200, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Besides: Did something change from your usability report last year? Not fundamentally. Some new breakage -- gv for example has been broken for a while (epdfview works though, so not a real problem); or some breakage in

Re: [PATCH 4/4] Implement /proc/cmdline and /proc/mounts as symlinks.

Hi, On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 07:05:15PM +0200, Jeremie Koenig wrote: > * /proc/cmdline -> /proc/2/cmdline (process 2 is usually gnumach) [...] > * /proc/mounts -> /etc/mtab (push the problem to mount) Well, if you prefer to keep these in one patch, I'm not sure it's useful to have the general sym

Re: [PATCH 0/8] Bring console-driver-xkb up to date

Hi, On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 03:13:36PM -0300, Diego Nieto Cid wrote: > At some point in it's history pc_kbd introduced support for GNU Mach > v2, Actually, it was probably the other way around: the console was originally written for oskit-mach (because it doesn't have a kernel console), and was

Re: [PATCH 3/4] Set an appropriate st_mode on symlinks.

Hi, On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 07:05:14PM +0200, Jeremie Koenig wrote: > + stat.st_size = strlen (symlink_target) : 0; Err... Did you actually try compiling this?... -antrik-

Re: What do you need from the Hurd for your day-to-day tasks?

Hi, On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 03:02:30PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > olafbuddenha...@gmx.net, le Wed 04 Aug 2010 19:37:18 +0200, a écrit : > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 02:36:49PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > olafbuddenha...@gmx.net, le Sat 24 Jul 2010 04:08:51 +0200, a écrit : > > > > - A

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Fix /proc/*/cmdline.

Hi, On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 07:03:50PM +0200, Jeremie Koenig wrote: > The procfs code is in a rather bad shape, I guess I should just take an > afternoon to read through the whole thing and fix/refactor stuff as I go. Indeed that would be great :-) -antrik-