Re: GNU Mach: disabling all network device drivers

2010-05-19 Thread Da Zheng
On 10-5-19 下午10:42, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Zheng Da, le Thu 13 May 2010 08:59:59 -0400, a écrit : >> general protection trap. I tried several drivers and always got the >> same problem. >> The error can be seen at http://i.imagehost.org/0382/Screenshot.png. >> >> addr2line shows me 0x1076e6 is at

Re: [PATCH] libthreads: mutex_lock holder debugging

2010-05-19 Thread Samuel Thibault
Sergio Lopez, le Thu 20 May 2010 00:37:48 +0200, a écrit : > El Wed, 19 May 2010 16:27:07 +0200 > Samuel Thibault escribió: > > > Hello, > > > > Sergio Lopez, le Fri 14 May 2010 12:35:41 +0200, a écrit : > > > I've preferred to create a new definition conditional instead of > > > using WAIT_DEBU

Re: [PATCH] libthreads: mutex_lock holder debugging

2010-05-19 Thread Sergio Lopez
El Wed, 19 May 2010 16:27:07 +0200 Samuel Thibault escribió: > Hello, > > Sergio Lopez, le Fri 14 May 2010 12:35:41 +0200, a écrit : > > I've preferred to create a new definition conditional instead of > > using WAIT_DEBUG, since this one changes cproc_t structure size. > > Mmm, I don't think i

Re: [PATCH] tmpfs: add padding to tmpfs_dirent structure

2010-05-19 Thread Sergio Lopez
El Wed, 19 May 2010 23:32:37 +0200 Samuel Thibault escribió: > Sergio Lopez, le Wed 19 May 2010 17:33:39 +0200, a écrit : > > El Wed, 19 May 2010 16:05:27 +0200 > > Carl Fredrik Hammar escribió: > > > > > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 04:19:34PM +0200, Sergio Lopez wrote: > > > > > > > > This patch

Re: [PATCH] tmpfs: add padding to tmpfs_dirent structure

2010-05-19 Thread Samuel Thibault
Sergio Lopez, le Wed 19 May 2010 17:33:39 +0200, a écrit : > El Wed, 19 May 2010 16:05:27 +0200 > Carl Fredrik Hammar escribió: > > > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 04:19:34PM +0200, Sergio Lopez wrote: > > > > > > This patch adds some padding to tmpfs_dirent structure as it's > > > suggested in the wi

Re: [PATCH] libthreads: mutex_lock holder debugging

2010-05-19 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Sergio Lopez, le Fri 14 May 2010 12:35:41 +0200, a écrit : > I've preferred to create a new definition conditional instead of using > WAIT_DEBUG, since this one changes cproc_t structure size. Mmm, I don't think it'd be a problem, since the cproc_t structure is not exposed to users of libt

Re: GNU Mach: disabling all network device drivers

2010-05-19 Thread Samuel Thibault
Zheng Da, le Thu 13 May 2010 08:59:59 -0400, a écrit : > general protection trap. I tried several drivers and always got the > same problem. > The error can be seen at http://i.imagehost.org/0382/Screenshot.png. > > addr2line shows me 0x1076e6 is at > /root/gnumach-build/../gnumach/i386/i386/spl.S

Re: [PATCH] tmpfs: add padding to tmpfs_dirent structure

2010-05-19 Thread Sergio Lopez
El Wed, 19 May 2010 16:05:27 +0200 Carl Fredrik Hammar escribió: > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 04:19:34PM +0200, Sergio Lopez wrote: > > > > This patch adds some padding to tmpfs_dirent structure as it's > > suggested in the wiki > > (http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/hurd/translator/tmpfs.html). > >

Re: [PATCH] mach_defpager: Fix external objects interface

2010-05-19 Thread Sergio Lopez
El Wed, 19 May 2010 10:17:00 +0200 escribió: > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 04:19:10PM +0200, Sergio Lopez wrote: > > > This patch fixes external objects interface in mach_defpager > > (current default pager in Hurd), so it can be used as backing store > > by other translators (like tmpfs). > > I don

Re: [PATCH] tmpfs: keep a reference to memory objects

2010-05-19 Thread Sergio Lopez
El Wed, 19 May 2010 10:37:21 +0200 escribió: > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 04:21:14PM +0200, Sergio Lopez wrote: > > > This patch modifies tmpfs to keep a reference (by mapping it into > > its own space) to each memory object created by the user, so they > > don't get inmediately terminated at the en

Re: [PATCH] tmpfs: add padding to tmpfs_dirent structure

2010-05-19 Thread Carl Fredrik Hammar
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 04:19:34PM +0200, Sergio Lopez wrote: > > This patch adds some padding to tmpfs_dirent structure as it's > suggested in the wiki > (http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/hurd/translator/tmpfs.html). > It seems Samuel beat you to it back in January: see commit 97c569. Regards,

Re: GSoC IRC meetings, dammit!

2010-05-19 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Am Dienstag, 18. Mai 2010, 16:15:13 schrieb Sébastien Duquette: > I would like to remind the fact that this is a public mailing-list, > criticizing people in public is a bit inconsiderate. This is the sort > of thing that should be settled in private. No names were called, and the GSoC is about ge

[bug #29914] *_reply.defs can't handle error replies due to type checks

2010-05-19 Thread Carl Fredrik Hammar
URL: Summary: *_reply.defs can't handle error replies due to type checks Project: The GNU Hurd Submitted by: hammy Submitted on: Wed 19 May 2010 02:05:14 PM CEST Category: GNU MIG

Re: GSoC IRC meetings, dammit!

2010-05-19 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 08:31:50AM +0300, Karim Allah Ahmed wrote: > As for the last meeting , I'm really sorry i had an Oral Exam that was > supposed to finish before the meeting but it didn't. I see :-) > Sorry again for missing the last meeting. Don't worry, it's not your fault... Just

Re: GSoC IRC meetings, dammit!

2010-05-19 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:15:13AM -0400, Sébastien Duquette wrote: > I would like to remind the fact that this is a public mailing-list, > criticizing people in public is a bit inconsiderate. This is the sort > of thing that should be settled in private. Well, it wasn't really meant as much

Re: [PATCH] mach_defpager: Fix external objects interface

2010-05-19 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 04:19:10PM +0200, Sergio Lopez wrote: > This patch fixes external objects interface in mach_defpager (current > default pager in Hurd), so it can be used as backing store by other > translators (like tmpfs). I don't know enough about this code to actually understand t

Re: GSoC IRC meetings, dammit!

2010-05-19 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 12:50:52AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > It's fine for me though if we don't change the time slot, we should clarify it > it's 10 or 10.30 UTC :-) 10:30. So, there it is :-) -antrik-

Re: [PATCH] tmpfs: keep a reference to memory objects

2010-05-19 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 04:21:14PM +0200, Sergio Lopez wrote: > This patch modifies tmpfs to keep a reference (by mapping it into its > own space) to each memory object created by the user, so they don't get > inmediately terminated at the end of the current operation. Hm... Do I get it righ