Re: hurd ChangeLog Makeconf

2007-11-07 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 10:44:08PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 02:10:05PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > I surrender. > > Heh, that sounds as if we had been fighting :-) I hope you didn't > actually perceive it like that... A bit perhaps. ;-P But you're

Re: hurd ChangeLog Makeconf

2007-11-07 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 02:10:05PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 04:44:59AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > I disagree. The configure script is responsible for ensuring a > > working build, or give a useful error message if it can't. A failure > > during the ac

Re: FOSDEM 2008

2007-11-07 Thread olafBuddenhagen
Hi, On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 08:20:54PM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > Question: do we want to have a Developer Room for giving talks, doing > hacking, etc.? Yes, I think we should try to get one if we can. People attending get much more out of the conference this way. > What do we have to tell

FOSDEM 2008

2007-11-07 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! FOSDEM 2008 is nearly there. OK, not quite yet (February 23rd/24th), but planning for it definitely is. Already some weeks ago I installed a coordination page into the wiki: . Please add yourself. If we want to stay in an a

Re: hurd ChangeLog Makeconf

2007-11-07 Thread Thomas Schwinge
Hello! On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 04:44:59AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 01:08:13AM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > They'll show something like ``cc1: error: unrecognized command line > > option "-fgnu89-inline"'', which is good enough for me, and good enough > > to go