Hello! On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 04:44:59AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 01:08:13AM +0100, Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > They'll show something like ``cc1: error: unrecognized command line > > option "-fgnu89-inline"'', which is good enough for me, and good enough > > to google for. > > I disagree. The configure script is responsible for ensuring a working > build, or give a useful error message if it can't. A failure during the > actual build is always a bug, either in the program, or in the > configure.
I surrender. I installed the following:
#v+
2007-11-07 Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* config.make.in (gnu89-inline-CFLAGS): New variable.
* Makeconf (CFLAGS): Evaluate that one instead of hard-coding.
Suggested by Olaf Buddenhagen,
<http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2007-11/msg00006.html>
* configure.in (libc_cv_gnu89_inline): Fill depending on a compile-time
test, as per glibc HEAD, 2007-11-07.
#v-
Regards,
Thomas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Bug-hurd mailing list Bug-hurd@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
