On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 04:31:55PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> > Has anyone ever worked on porting the GDB distribution's gdbserver to
> > GNU/Hurd?
>
> I'm pretty sure the answer to that question is no.
As far as I know.
> > In case you don't know: this would allow for debugging programs on
>
Thomas Schwinge, le Sat 23 Dec 2006 19:36:02 +0100, a écrit :
> On my Athlon XP 1.6 GHz (or similar, I don't know...) I didn't notice any
> speedup (compared to the current Debian package), but in contrast to the
> Debian package I had the GCC smashing stack protection and the GNU Mach
> kernel deb
Hello!
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 12:45:11AM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Global pages permit to keep the kernel pages in the TLB whatever the
> current process, here is a patch for supporting them. On my Pentium M, I
> get a 5% speedup on dd < /dev/zero bs=1 > /dev/null .
On my Athlon XP 1.6 GHz
> Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 12:10:22 +0100
> From: Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Hello!
>
> Has anyone ever worked on porting the GDB distribution's gdbserver to
> GNU/Hurd?
I'm pretty sure the answer to that question is no.
> In case you don't know: this would allow for debugging progra
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 03:56:17PM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> If you have any reports about gdbserver not working on GNU/Hurd then
> report them here so that they can be fixed.
Uhm, that's exactly what I did in my original email, you may want to
re-read it:
| Has anyone ever worked on porti
Hello!
Has anyone ever worked on porting the GDB distribution's gdbserver to
GNU/Hurd?
In case you don't know: this would allow for debugging programs on
GNU/Hurd systems using a cross debugger running on another system (e.g. a
non GNU/Hurd one). This is of advantage if you're cross compiling an
Update of task #6200 (project hurd):
Wiki-like text discussion box: => There's a bit of
work to do both in the Hurd and glibc too, because of
GNU Mach's thread_get_state(i386_FLOAT_STATE) call.
- hurd/exec/elfcore.c:fetch_thread_fpregset(): in the core dump, fpx
state w
Barry deFreese, le Fri 22 Dec 2006 23:45:18 -0500, a écrit :
> 1) What do I do with the xmm space, ignore it?
Of course no, since fxsave will fill it up anyway.
> 2) Where is the best place to check for fxsr? Should it be done in
> fpu.c after we determine fpu_type = FP_387?
That should be fine
