Barry deFreese, le Sat 28 Oct 2006 20:48:17 -0400, a écrit :
> The %p one is even a bit of a question. I believe %p is correct but I also
> dropped the 0x and maybe I shouldn't have?
You shouldn't indeed. Some tools may depend on being able to parse
this.
Samuel
_
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Schwinge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Barry deFreese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 7:20 PM
Subject: Re: Gnumach warnings clean-up round 1
Thomas,
Thanks! I don't think I should have "broken" anything, I was more worried
about t
Hello!
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 10:04:23PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Does GNU mach's printf support %p?
It didn't use to, but...
#v+
2006-06-09 Stefan Siegl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
* kern/printf.c (_doprnt): Support printing of pointer addresses.
#v-
Barry: I can have a look
- Original Message -
From: "Samuel Thibault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Barry deFreese" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 4:04 PM
Subject: Re: Gnumach warnings clean-up round 1
Hi,
Does GNU mach's printf support %p?
Samuel
According to printf.c it does and
Hi,
Does GNU mach's printf support %p?
Samuel
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
Bug-hurd@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
Hey folks,
I was looking at cleaning up many of the warnings when building
gnumach-1-branch. I have only gotten through the gnumach/ipc/ dir so far
but before I went any further I wanted some opinions on whether I was way
off base on what I have done so far??
Thanks,
Barry deFreese (aka bd
Hi,
--- Shakthi Kannan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I need info on cross-compiling GNU Mach and GNU Hurd
> on on GNU/Linux (x86).
Not needed anymore. I have compiled GNU Hurd on GNU
Hurd K10 itself (Pentium III, 128 MB, 7 GB for Hurd).
Thanks to tschwinge and azeem at #hurd.
It is the CVS checko
Hi,
at Systems expo, there was a booth by the CS department of the
university of Erlangen showcasing their FAUMachine virtual machine.
They advertised it as VMWare-like, but it seems to be closer to qemu
(and indeed, after I asked them for a comparison to qemu, the guy
conceded they were using the
It seems this is a rather late reply to an e-mail sent last March. So, yes,
it was several months ago :)
Mike Heath
On 10/28/06, Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 05:54:07PM -0400, D.E. Evans via RT wrote:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun Mar 12 18:13
It seems this is a rather late reply to an e-mail sent last March. So, yes,
it was several months ago :)
Mike Heath
On 10/28/06, Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 05:54:07PM -0400, D.E. Evans via RT wrote:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun Mar 12 18:13
It seems this is a rather late reply to an e-mail sent last March. So, yes, it was several months ago :)
Mike Heath
On 10/28/06, Thomas Schwinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello!On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 05:54:07PM -0400, D.E. Evans via RT wrote:> > [
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun Mar 12 18:13:18 2006]:
Hello!
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 05:54:07PM -0400, D.E. Evans via RT wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun Mar 12 18:13:18 2006]:
> > what about just contacting the [EMAIL PROTECTED] [1]? I'll just CC this
> > mail to him.
> >
> > [1] http://lists.gnu.org/
>
> We don't have access to make modificati
Hello!
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 05:54:07PM -0400, D.E. Evans via RT wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun Mar 12 18:13:18 2006]:
> > what about just contacting the [EMAIL PROTECTED] [1]? I'll just CC this
> > mail to him.
> >
> > [1] http://lists.gnu.org/
>
> We don't have access to make modificati
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun Mar 12 18:13:18 2006]:
>
> what about just contacting the [EMAIL PROTECTED] [1]? I'll just CC this
> mail to him.
>
> [1] http://lists.gnu.org/
We don't have access to make modifications to the lists. I think only
sysadmin does.
Hello!
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 07:13:54AM -0400, I wrote:
> The Hurd parts of glibc need maintenance!
>
>
> We currently (have to) build glibc ``--without-tls'' and forcibly set
> ``libc_cv_z_relro=no'', to work around bugs in the otherwise enabled
> parts of the code.
Both of those options are
Hello!
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 12:57:07AM -0700, Shakthi Kannan wrote:
> I need info on cross-compiling GNU Mach and GNU Hurd
> on on GNU/Linux (x86).
GNU Mach --- as it doesn't depend on an operating system environment ---
doesn't need to be cross-compiled.
> http://people.via.ecp.fr/~walken/hu
Greetings!
I have installed Debian GNU Hurd K10 on my T41. I have
been able to compile GNU Mach on GNU Hurd.
I need info on cross-compiling GNU Mach and GNU Hurd
on on GNU/Linux (x86).
I found the following two links:
http://people.via.ecp.fr/~walken/hurd/compile.html
http://www.nongnu.org/thu
17 matches
Mail list logo
