On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 00:24:09 +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> [Back on the list.]
> > >$ automake --version
> > automake (GNU automake) 1.4-p6
> >
> > >$ autoconf --version
> > autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.60a
>
> The ancient version of Automake is very likely the problem. How do you
> happen to h
[Back on the list.]
Hello!
> >$ automake --version
> automake (GNU automake) 1.4-p6
>
> >$ autoconf --version
> autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.60a
The ancient version of Automake is very likely the problem. How do you
happen to have such an old version of Automake installed, but nearly the
freshes
Thomas Schwinge wrote:
However difficult the previous build system was, i have managed to
compile some of the linux-2.6 kernel drivers by using it.
This is great news! Did you ``only'' get them to compile or do they
actually work?
Currently i am at the compile-only stage. I have narrowed do
Hello!
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 09:27:04PM +0300, Constantine Kousoulos wrote:
> First of all, many congrats to Thomas Schwinge for his effort to
> automake'fy GNU Mach.
Thanks! :-)
> However difficult the previous build system was, i have managed to
> compile some of the linux-2.6 kernel drive
Hello,
First of all, many congrats to Thomas Schwinge for his effort to
automake'fy GNU Mach. The old make-based code had become a
serious drawback to the scalability and resusability of the system.
However difficult the previous build system was, i have managed to
compile some of the linux-2.6
