Bas Wijnen wrote:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 07:24:25PM +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
I think they should be implemented in the Hurd.
Would you like todo this?
Yes, I would. But as Ognyan says:
But we are far away from all that, and IMHO we should first finish
porting to L4 before dealing with suc
Your message dated Mon, 14 Jun 2004 20:16:10 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Oops
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Кондиционеры настенного типа – цены ниже не
бывают!!!
Сплит-система Panasonic CS-PC7CKE –
380 у. е.Сплит-система LG S07LHK - 320 у.
е.
Хит сезона 2004!Сплит-система Hitachi RAS-07CH4/RAC-07CHV4 – 490
y.e.
5 лет на рынке
кондиционирования!
Широкий ассортимент кондиционеров различных
>I think they should be implemented in the Hurd.
>
> Would you like todo this?
Yes, I would.
Then do so.
But as Ognyan says: But we are far away from all that, and IMHO we
should first finish porting to L4 before dealing with such stuff.
Where does he say this? I can't see
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 07:24:25PM +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>I think they should be implemented in the Hurd.
>
> Would you like todo this?
Yes, I would. But as Ognyan says:
But we are far away from all that, and IMHO we should first finish
porting to L4 before dealing with such stuff.
Perhaps the GNU project should have thought about a portable
virtual-file system library in the spririt of gnulib back then when
it become at least possible that the Hurd was not ready as basis
for the desktop.
Or perhaps people should shutup and make the Hurd a viable choice for
the d
I think they should be implemented in the Hurd.
Would you like todo this?
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
X may be outdated, but many programs use it.
Please back up these claims; or provide reasons why you think it is
so.
Do you know about XGGI?
A project that is far more "outdated" then X11.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list
May I quote you?
That you have a crystal ball that can look into the future? Sure why
not. But only if you make this crystal ball avaiable for everyone to
look into.
You said once software wasn't something magic. ;)
And I still claim that it isn't; claming that it is shows that one
does n
Package: hurd
Version: 20040508-2
Severity: normal
In postinst the flag --not-create-home is passed to adduser
the correct flag is --no-create-home. At least in my version
of adduser.
Cheers,
Michael
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http:
So the goal of the GNU project is
chmod -R a+rwx /
Learn to read, "without screwing up for others".
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>Starting X does not make sense from a remote machine.
>
> Starting X sessions remotly makes perfect sense, which is what I am
> talking about. Fireing up a X server remotely makes also perfect
> sense, take the example that the X server crashed or you upgraded it
> or
Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>AFAIK GNU/Hurd will mainly support GGI/KGI instead.
>
> Didn't know that you have a crystal ball that can look into the
> future... :)
May I quote you?
You said once software wasn't something magic. ;)
Software is made by human decisions, and what I told you was also
Concrete cases are completely irrelevant. You can't contruct all cases
in 15 mails; there is at least one important case you can't think of.
As I understand the idea behind the design principles of the Hurd is:
Let the user decide, how to use his computer, so give him all
possibilities. The user
Необходим приток новых клиентов?
Если да - то мы готовы сделать рассылку Вашей рекламной информации по эл. ящикам
в сети интернет
Мы предлагаем:превосходные условия и свежайшие базы адресов собранных за
последние месяцы.
Наш
телефон:
(095)
722-5727
Rian Hunter wrote:
> On Sun, 2004-06-13 at 10:34, "Sören Schulze" wrote:
> > Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
> > >I know about Xnest and I think it's a good idea, but it does not
> > >fix general design lacks in XFree86.
> > >
> > > Fixing XFree86 is kinda out of the scope of GNU/Hurd...
> >
> >
SMALL PAKET
6 GÜNÜN TAMAMI99.000.000 TL
3* LI OTELLERDE 5 GECE 6 GÜN, YARIM PANSÝYON KONAKLAMA
PLAJ,HAVUZ,KLÝMA...
NOT:MEDIUM PAKET,LARGE PAKET VE XLARGE PAKET SORUNUZ...
ETUR TURÝZM
TEL:0212 232 92 92
FAX:0212 231 25 70
___
Bug-hurd mailing
Bas Wijnen wrote:
While we're talking about "what really should be supported", I have an other
idea. I went to a lecture about smartcard filesystems some time ago and it
was partly about journalling filesystems. I think they should be implemented
in the Hurd.
I'm implementing ext3 server for the
18 matches
Mail list logo
