Title: Á¦¸ñ¾øÀ½
ÇÁ¸°ÅÍ À×Å©°ªÀÌ ³Ê¹« ºÎ´ãµÇ½ÃÁÒ?
ÀÌÁ¦´Â ºñ½Ñ Á¤Ç°À» »ç¿ëÇϽÃÁö ¾Ê¾Æµµ µË´Ï´Ù.
5-10ºÐ¸¸ ¼ö°íÇÏ½Ã¸é ºñ½Ñ À×Å©°ªÀ» 10ºÐÀÇ 1·Î ÁÙÀϼö ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù.
¸®ÇÊ À×Å©¸¦ ¾²¼Åµµ ÇÁ¸°ÅÍ ¼º´É¿¡´Â ¾Æ¹«·± ÇÏÀÚ°¡ ¾øÀ¸¸ç Àμâ ÈÁú ¶ÇÇÑ Â÷À̸¦
´À³¢½ÃÁö ¸øÇϽǰÍÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
ÀúÈñ À×Å©´Â ÇϳªÀÇ Á¦Ç°Àº SAMS
ÇÕ´Ï´Ù. 1. ÇÏ·çÀÇ ÇнÀ ºÐ·®(Àüü10¹®Àå Á¤µµ)À» ¼³Á¤ÇÏ°í ÇнÀÇÒ ¹®ÀåÀ» ÀÔ¿¡¼ ÀÚµ¿È µÉ ¶§±îÁö ¿¬½ÀÀ» ½Ç½Ã ÇÑ´Ù.
º¸Åë ÇÑ ¹®ÀåÀ» ¾Ï±âÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì¶ó¸é 20¹ø Á¤µµ¸¸ ¿¬½ÀÇÏ°í ÀÌÇØÇÏ¸é ´©±¸µçÁö ¾Ï±â ÇÒ¼ö ÀÖÀ» °ÍÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ¹®Á¦´Â
¹®ÀåÀÚü¸¦ ¾Ï±âÇÏ´Â °Í°ú ÀÌ°ÍÀ» ÀÔ¿¡¼ ÀÚµ¿ÀûÀ¸·Î ³ª¿Ã ¼ö ÀÖµµ·Ï ¿¬½ÀÇÏ´Â
--- Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't see anything wrong with the current diskfs_make_node signature.
> It can only return failure for a malloc failure.
>
The advantages I see of using a signature that returns an error are:
1. Any users of make_node, this applies to both ne
O Çã¶ô¾øÀÌ ¸ÞÀÏÀ» º¸³»¼ Á˼ÛÇÕ´Ï´Ù. º» ¸ÞÀÏÀº ÀÏȸ¼º ¸ÞÀÏÀ̸ç, Àý´ë·Î ´Ù½Ã
º¸³»Áö ¾Ê°Ú½À´Ï´Ù.
¾È³çÇϼ¼¿ä? ´ºÆ®¸®¼Ç Æ÷
¶óÀÌÇÁ Ä«Æä ´º»ç¸ðÆÀ
ȲÀÎÅÂÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
"´ºÆ®¸®¼Ç Æ÷ ¶óÀÌÇÁ" ¿ÀÇ 10¿©ÀÏ ¸¸¿¡ ¹ú½á ¼º°øÀÚµéÀÌ ¼Ó¼Ó ź»ýÇÏ°í
ÀÖ½À´Ï´
I don't see anything wrong with the current diskfs_make_node signature.
It can only return failure for a malloc failure.
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
I changed the signature of diskfs_make_node to return an error_t like
diskfs_make_peropen or diskfs_make_protid.
I'm holding back on the libnetfs stuff until I know how make_protid should
act wrt it iouser struct.
2002-04-02 James A. Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ext2fs:
* inode.c (di
Title: 2424, ÀÎÅͳÝÀÌ»ç, À̻翪°æ¸Å, ÀÌ»ç, Æ÷ÀåÀÌ»ç, »ç¹«½ÇÀÌ»ç, °øÀåÀÌ»ç, ÇØ¿ÜÀÌ»ç, º¸°üÀÌ»ç, ÀÌ»çÁ¤º¸¹ðÅ©!
(ÁÖ)½ºÇǵåÀ̻絵¿ò¹æ
ÀúÈñ (ÁÖ)½ºÇǵåÀ̻絵¿ò¹æÀº ȸ»ç ¼³¸³ÀÌ·¡ Áö±Ý±îÁö ¿ÀÇÁ¶óÀο¡¼ ½×¾Æ¿Â À̻缺ñ½º
Know-How¿Í ¿ÀÇÁ¶óÀÎ À̻縦 ´ëÇ¥ÇÏ´Â
Some compiler warning fixes. And an updated copyright.
2002-04-02 James A. Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
daemons:
* console-run.c: Updated the copyright.
nfsd:
* fsys.c: Include .
* main.c: Likewise.
sutils:
* halt.c: Include .
* reboot.c: Likewise.
Title: :::060-707-9292:::
¢Á Çѱ¹Ãë¾÷Á¤º¸ÀÔ´Ï´Ù.¾Æ·¡ ÀÚ·á´Â
ÀúÈñ ȸ»ç¿¡ µî·ÏµÇ¾î ÀÖ´Â ±¸Àξ÷ü ±¸ÀÎÇöȲÁß ÀϺκÐÀÇÈ«º¸ÀÚ·áÀÔ´Ï´Ù. ÀÌ¿Ü¿¡µµ Àü±¹¿¡¼ ±¸ÀÎÀ» Èñ¸ÁÇϽôÂ
±¸Àξ÷üµéÀ̸ÅÀÏ »õ·Ó°Ô µî·ÏÀ» ÇÏ°í ÀÖ½À´Ï´Ù. ¿ì¼±, ±ÍÇϲ²¼ ÀúÈñ ȸ»ç¿¡ ±¸Á÷µî·ÏÀ»ÇØ Áֽøé
µî·ÏµÈ ±¸Àξ÷üÀÇ Á
> > Humm, again I followed the example in libdiskfs/io-restrict-auth.c
> > .
>
> This is the original:
>
> newpi = netfs_make_protid (user->po, new_user);
> if (newpi)
> {
> *newport = ports_get_right (newpi);
> mutex_unlock (&user->po->np->lock);
> *newporttype = MAC
> The original is correct. However, in libdiskfs/io-restrict-auth.c USER, which
> is equivalent to NEW_USER, is duplicated. Should the libnetfs implementation
> also duplicate NEW_USER so it can be free'd?
Thanks for catching this. The libdiskfs implementation looks wrong.
Here is a patch:
2
> > > Just a reminder, there are outstanding documentation patches for
> > hurd.texi.
> >
> > Could you write these?
> >
>
> Write what? I can write more documentation if you like ;)
I thought you meant outstanding as in need to update it for these
changes. Sorry.
> > > Index: ftpfs/fs.c
Title: mail
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
Title: mail
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 09:12:12PM -0500, Neal H Walfield wrote:
> >
> > Just a reminder, there are outstanding documentation patches for hurd.texi.
>
> Could you write these?
He already did :) [there are patches for hurd.texi by him on the list]
Thanks,
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian
15 matches
Mail list logo
