¿µ»ó(ºñµð¿À) ÆíÁý ¹è¿òÅÍ

2002-01-13 Thread µð¸ð¼Ç
Title: [µð¸ð¼Ç] °­Á Ŀ¸®Å§·³ ¾È³»           µðÁöÅÐ ¿

Re: PROPOSAL: making liblinux_net library

2002-01-13 Thread Niels Möller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes: > Peter Novodvorsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > 1). I propose to move all linux code out of pfinet and make separated > > library with linux ip stack. > > This is not a horrible idea, and I once thought of doing the same > thing myself.

Re: Meaning of sys_nerr (and porting programs)

2002-01-13 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 1998-06-01 Gordon Matzigkeit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * sysdeps/mach/hurd/errlist.c (sys_nerr, _sys_nerr): Make weak > aliases for _hurd_nerr, for programs that don't use sys_errlist, > but need sys_err. First, that's a typo; it sh

bug-hurd님 안녕하세요? *^^*((영어 & 일어 mailing service 홍보))*^^*

2002-01-13 Thread 박재현
Title: :::Happy mail::: Happymail ¹× ±âŸ ¹®ÀÇ 02-588-0510 2002³â 1¿ù  ¢Ã Ä£±¸ÀÇ Ãæ°í ¢Ñ [¿µ¾î·Î ¿ô¾î¿

Re: Meaning of sys_nerr (and porting programs)

2002-01-13 Thread Roland McGrath
I would have thought sys_nerr should not be defined at all, just as sys_errlist is not. The two go together. In fact, before your report I thought it was not defined. In the libc change logs (libc/ChangeLog.8) I see: 1998-06-01 Gordon Matzigkeit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * sysdeps/mach/hu