> I have a system here that I want to run headless - I was thinking
> since I don't need the console on it, it might be cool to run
> oskit-mach on it.
Cool, yes. But off hand I would still recommend gnumach rather than
oskit-mach for anyone who is not actively interested in debugging an
unstabl
Quoting Farid Hajji <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > technical features you need, there is, for example, the requirement to
> have
> > a network-wide unique process id for a task. Thomas calls such a
> network
> > of Hurd systems a "collective". I guess if you want to do
> distributed
> > systems in a
On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 06:37:15PM +0100, Farid Hajji wrote:
> You want to migrate _Mach_ ports over the net?
Actualy, what I thought of was only port forwarding.
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marcus Brinkmann GNUhttp://
At Sun, 30 Dec 2001 16:09:57 +0100 (CET),
Farid Hajji wrote:
> Regarding CORBA: The only part of it that we'll need in the Hurd
> right now, is a good IDL stub generator that could replace MIG.
> The path right now looks like we're needing to switch to flick
> IDL compiler and change the *.defs wi
To get off this list click here
___
Bug-hurd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-hurd
> RT. The Hurd is not a real time system. It doesn't make use of RT. The
> Hurd runs on RT Mach, though. So you can use the real time extensions in a
> Hurd system, but you can't rely on the Hurd servers or the C library to do
> any RT'ish things for you. Are the real time changes free? We m
> Now, I am reading (and studing) all docs that I could find about CMU
> Mach UX e US, OSF e Utah Mach . I read old massages from lists too and I
> strange that many important stuffs in research and others implementation
> (like NORMA IPC, SMP, RT, ports...) are missing in the official
> disti
--- Patrick Strasser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > mah wrote:
> >
> > i have a realtek 8029 card along with its linux drivers.
>
> The 8029 is compatible to the NE2000. Regarding the GNU Hurd
> Hardware
> Compatibility Guide (
> http://www.urbanophile.com/arenn/hacking/hurd/hurd-hardware.html
On Sun, Dec 30, 2001 at 04:39:03AM -0200, Ciro Cavani wrote:
> Now, I am reading (and studing) all docs that I could find about CMU
> Mach UX e US, OSF e Utah Mach . I read old massages from lists too and I
> strange that many important stuffs in research and others implementation
> (like NORMA
> mah wrote:
>
> i have a realtek 8029 card along with its linux drivers.
The 8029 is compatible to the NE2000. Regarding the GNU Hurd Hardware
Compatibility Guide (
http://www.urbanophile.com/arenn/hacking/hurd/hurd-hardware.html )
GNUMach supports the PCI NE2000.
> i am using pcq linux 7.1 w
10 matches
Mail list logo
