Re: cpu usage and link update in /libexec/runsystem

2001-12-18 Thread Niels Möller
Nuno Morgadinho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Iam running the hurd on vmware on top of linux (see screenshot here >http://alunos.uevora.pt/~l13591/hurd-vmware.png) and I noticed on my system monitor >that the cpu usage was 100%. Surely this is not normal, is it? > > > > cpu usage of vmware

Re: term & user space console

2001-12-18 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 01:44:08PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes: > > > > The pty interface does also not handle START and STOP. It stores > > > the state in flags, but it does not make use of it in any way. > > > > That's a bug. > > There

Re: term & user space console

2001-12-18 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes: > > The pty interface does also not handle START and STOP. It stores > > the state in flags, but it does not make use of it in any way. > > That's a bug. There should be no bug here. Output happens under the control of pty_io_read, and it does

Re: cpu usage and link update in /libexec/runsystem

2001-12-18 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 09:12:12PM +, Nuno Morgadinho wrote: > On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 20:03:54 +0100 > Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 03:45:19PM +, Nuno Morgadinho wrote: > > > Hello everyone, > > > > > > Iam running the hurd on vmware on top of li

Re: term & user space console

2001-12-18 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > For reference, here is the structure that defines the bottom half. > For example, there is suspend_physical_output() which supposedly implements > STOP, and start_output(), which resumes it (but does other things as well). First, the canonical imple

Re: term & user space console

2001-12-18 Thread Thomas Bushnell, BSG
Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The mach terminal device interface is also used for the console device, > although it of course does not implement any of the status calls. This is > why STOP (^S) and START (^Q) don't work. See below for the strategy for the fix. > The pty interf

Re: cpu usage and link update in /libexec/runsystem

2001-12-18 Thread Nuno Morgadinho
On Tue, 18 Dec 2001 20:03:54 +0100 Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 03:45:19PM +, Nuno Morgadinho wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > Iam running the hurd on vmware on top of linux (see screenshot here >http://alunos.uevora.pt/~l13591/hurd-vmware.png) and

Re: cpu usage and link update in /libexec/runsystem

2001-12-18 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Tue, Dec 18, 2001 at 03:45:19PM +, Nuno Morgadinho wrote: > Hello everyone, > > Iam running the hurd on vmware on top of linux (see screenshot here >http://alunos.uevora.pt/~l13591/hurd-vmware.png) and I noticed on my system monitor >that the cpu usage was 100%. Surely this is not normal

Re: cpu usage and link update in /libexec/runsystem

2001-12-18 Thread Roland McGrath
> Iam running the hurd on vmware on top of linux (see screenshot here > http://alunos.uevora.pt/~l13591/hurd-vmware.png) and I noticed on my > system monitor that the cpu usage was 100%. Surely this is not normal, is > it? In my experience that is normal for vmware. It has nothing to do with th

cpu usage and link update in /libexec/runsystem

2001-12-18 Thread Nuno Morgadinho
Hello everyone, Iam running the hurd on vmware on top of linux (see screenshot here http://alunos.uevora.pt/~l13591/hurd-vmware.png) and I noticed on my system monitor that the cpu usage was 100%. Surely this is not normal, is it? Also, while running ./native-install the second time in my hurd