äÏÂÒÏÅ ×ÒÅÍÑ ÓÕÔÏË bug-hurd,
--
Roman Y. Kraevsky
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ:36828239
[Sunday, July 23, 2000, 4:02:00]
Your message dated Sun, 23 Jul 2000 02:30:42 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#67598: gnumach 2.95.2 update
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
> When defining DONT_CACHE_MEMORY_OBJECTS in ext2fs.h, a thread can get stuck
> in memcpy(), pager/pager-memcpy (called by diskfs/rdwr-internal, called by
> io_read). I can provide a gdb trace if someone is interested.
What that means is that it is blocked on a page fault and the file pager is
no
I'm not planning on doing any work on gnumach. When I do get hacking
again, I will only do oskit-mach. I don't think Thomas or anyone else
plans to do any significant kernel hacking, just necessary maintenance like
this. So I think you (and Kettenis and Okuji) should just feel free to
check the
Package: gnumach
Version: N/A
Hi,
the included patch makes gnumach ready for gcc 2.95.2, fixes some errors
and lets gnumach use the stdarg inetrface instead vararg. It is tested and
included in the latest Debian package. I verified that the ChangeLog entry
matches the patch content. Please check
Hi,
When defining DONT_CACHE_MEMORY_OBJECTS in ext2fs.h, a thread can get stuck
in memcpy(), pager/pager-memcpy (called by diskfs/rdwr-internal, called by
io_read). I can provide a gdb trace if someone is interested.
About the purpose of this symbol, I could only find the ChangeLog:
Tue May 9
