Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2

2000-02-29 Thread Chris Lingard
Hello I am too new to offer any suggestions as to cause of this bug. If anyone want to post a patch to either test a cure, or to output further diagnosics please post them. I have the latest source and both compilers, so a test is trivial. I can test anything on offer. Chris

Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2

2000-02-29 Thread Marcus Brinkmann
On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 05:10:17PM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote: > That is, try all permutations of using old shared > libraries with the new proc, varying old vs new libraries one by one (I > mean the same exact hurd sources where "new" is compiled with gcc-2.95.2 > and "old" is compiled with anot

Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2

2000-02-29 Thread Roland McGrath
Thanks for your efforts, Chris. I wound up just biting the bullet and building a gcc-2.95.2 cross-compiler on my Linux box and cross-compiling hurd with that myself last night. I'm now able to reproduce the problem you are seeing. I am still at a loss for exactly what is going on, but I only sp

Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2

2000-02-29 Thread Roland McGrath
> I am still at a loss for exactly what is going on, but I only spent a > little while digging into it. It might be a while before I can spend a lot > of time looking into this, so if anyone else feels like some hardcore > debugging and wants to take a crack at it, please do. Anyone who looks >

Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2

2000-02-29 Thread Chris Lingard
Hello Marcus, Roland pointed out what I should have done; attached is a better report (I hope). Debugging operating systems is new to me, I better read the man pages and a book. Chris root78 p3 S 0:00.07 boot -d -I -Tdevice /boot/servers.boot hd1s1 - 79 ? Sp0:00.13