On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 05:10:17PM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote: > That is, try all permutations of using old shared > libraries with the new proc, varying old vs new libraries one by one (I > mean the same exact hurd sources where "new" is compiled with gcc-2.95.2 > and "old" is compiled with another compiler and the "old" set all works > together fine in your setup). Maybe also try with/without optimization ("-g -O2", "-g"), to exclude the remote possibility of a gcc bug... Marcus -- `Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org Check Key server Marcus Brinkmann GNU http://www.gnu.org for public PGP Key [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Key ID 36E7CD09 http://homepage.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/Marcus.Brinkmann/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Jeff Bailey
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Roland McGrath
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Chris Lingard
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Jeff Bailey
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Roland McGrath
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Chris Lingard
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Marcus Brinkmann
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Chris Lingard
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Roland McGrath
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Roland McGrath
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Marcus Brinkmann
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Chris Lingard
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Chris Lingard
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Chris Lingard
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Chris Lingard
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Chris Lingard
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Roland McGrath
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Chris Lingard
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Roland McGrath
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Chris Lingard
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Thomas Bushnell, BSG