On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 05:10:17PM -0500, Roland McGrath wrote:
> That is, try all permutations of using old shared
> libraries with the new proc, varying old vs new libraries one by one (I
> mean the same exact hurd sources where "new" is compiled with gcc-2.95.2
> and "old" is compiled with another compiler and the "old" set all works
> together fine in your setup).
Maybe also try with/without optimization ("-g -O2", "-g"), to exclude the
remote possibility of a gcc bug...
Marcus
--
`Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org Check Key server
Marcus Brinkmann GNU http://www.gnu.org for public PGP Key
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Key ID 36E7CD09
http://homepage.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/Marcus.Brinkmann/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Jeff Bailey
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Roland McGrath
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Chris Lingard
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Jeff Bailey
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Roland McGrath
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Chris Lingard
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Marcus Brinkmann
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Chris Lingard
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Roland McGrath
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Roland McGrath
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Marcus Brinkmann
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Chris Lingard
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Chris Lingard
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Chris Lingard
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Chris Lingard
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Chris Lingard
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Roland McGrath
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Chris Lingard
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Roland McGrath
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Chris Lingard
- Re: Proc failure with gcc-2.95.2 Thomas Bushnell, BSG
