Il 24/04/2013 14:18, Pádraig Brady ha scritto:
> On 04/23/2013 11:16 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:54:03AM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>>> I'm still thinking the gnulib patch should be applied though,
>>
>> Since the regression in glibc was detected by this gnulib test,
>
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 01:18:52PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 04/23/2013 11:16 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:54:03AM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> >> I'm still thinking the gnulib patch should be applied though,
> >
> > Since the regression in glibc was detected b
On 04/23/2013 11:16 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:54:03AM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
>> I'm still thinking the gnulib patch should be applied though,
>
> Since the regression in glibc was detected by this gnulib test,
> I'm not sure ignoring all EAI_SYSTEM errors would b
: Connection refused
> >>> system error: Connection refused
> >>> system error: Connection refused
> >>> FAIL: test-getaddrinfo
> >>>
> >>> Because this is a connection problem, it's remotely possible this has
> >>>
now failing in Fedora Rawhide. This failure
>>> started to happen within the last week.
>>>
>>> system error: Connection refused
>>> system error: Connection refused
>>> system error: Connection refused
>>> system error: Connecti
d to happen within the last week.
> >
> > system error: Connection refused
> > system error: Connection refused
> > system error: Connection refused
> > system error: Connection refused
> > FAIL: test-getaddrinfo
> >
> > Because this is a co
tem error: Connection refused
> system error: Connection refused
> system error: Connection refused
> FAIL: test-getaddrinfo
>
> Because this is a connection problem, it's remotely possible this has
> happened because of a change in Koji (the Fedora build system) which
: Connection refused
FAIL: test-getaddrinfo
Because this is a connection problem, it's remotely possible this has
happened because of a change in Koji (the Fedora build system) which
has no network access.
Full build log:
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/180/5290180/build.log
Ver
|5 +
tests/test-getaddrinfo.c |2 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index 8f96680..5df0852 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2011-05-03 Eric Blake
+
+ test-getaddrinfo: report error information
Eric Blake writes:
> OK to apply this patch?
Yes please do.
/Simon
Eric Blake byu.net> writes:
> So if I can pinpoint
> the failure to a cygwin bug and get it fixed before the formal release of
1.7,
> then gnulib does not have to worry about working around anything.
Update: the bug was indeed in cygwin, and is now fixed - POSIX requires
implementations to h
I'm encountering a failure of test-getaddrinfo when running the coreutils
testsuite on cygwin 1.7. Cygwin 1.7 is not a formal release yet, and cygwin
1.5 lacked getaddrinfo altogether (and I have verified that the gnulib
replacement getaddrinfo works just fine in cygwin 1.5). So if
Ondřej Vašík writes:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> + if (res == EAI_AGAIN)
>> +{
>> + fprintf (stderr, "skipping getaddrinfo test: no network?\n");
>> + return 77;
>> +}
>
> Actually this does break the test-suite if more than one of the subtests
> are skipped (network unavailab
e: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:41:55 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] test-getaddrinfo: fix usage of skip return code 77
* tests/test-gettaddrinfo.c: Return skip code 77 only
for first occurance of skip (4x77 is not 77)
---
ChangeLog|6 ++
tests/test-getaddrinfo.c |6 ++
2 files cha
Jim Meyering writes:
> Simon Josefsson wrote:
>> Jim Meyering writes:
>>> Mark McLoughlin noticed that the getaddrinfo test fails
>>> when there's no network, and sent the patch below.
>>>
>>> This looks like a good idea.
>>> Though maybe we should make it skip the test (return 77) after saying
ned.
Here's what I expect to push:
>From 4f9195e68fd2c8563d7d5d9a0d29783641db46cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark McLoughlin
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:06:31 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] test-getaddrinfo: skip (don't fail) this test when there's no
network
* tests/test-getaddrinfo
Jim Meyering writes:
> Hi Simon,
>
> Mark McLoughlin noticed that the getaddrinfo test fails
> when there's no network, and sent the patch below.
>
> This looks like a good idea.
> Though maybe we should make it skip the test (return 77) after saying why:
>
> fprintf (stderr, "skipping geta
")
If you like it, let me know and I'll take care of it.
Subject: [PATCH] gnulib/tests: allow test-getaddrinfo to pass when offline
From: Mark McLoughlin
To: Jim Meyering
Cc: libvir-list
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:30:27 +
Message-Id: <1232958627.3724.16.ca...@b
y failure in name resolution
FAIL: test-getaddrinfo
PASS: test-netinet_in
PASS: test-stdbool
PASS: test-stdio
PASS: test-string
PASS: test-sys_socket
===
1 of 7 tests failed
===
make[4]: *** [check-TESTS] Fehler 1
real7m29.216s
user0m0.811s
sys 0m0.136
Bruno Haible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi Simon,
>
> "make check" with the getaddrinfo-tests module yields a lot of output:
...
> Can you make this test silent when it succeeds? For example, write the
> output into a temporary file, and print the contents of that file or not,
> depending wheth
nameinfo 0: Unknown error
ip 66.249.93.104
port 389
PASS: test-getaddrinfo
Can you make this test silent when it succeeds? For example, write the
output into a temporary file, and print the contents of that file or not,
depending whether the test program exited with
21 matches
Mail list logo
