On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 01:18:52PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 04/23/2013 11:16 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:54:03AM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote: > >> I'm still thinking the gnulib patch should be applied though, > > > > Since the regression in glibc was detected by this gnulib test, > > I'm not sure ignoring all EAI_SYSTEM errors would be a good idea. > > That's a happy accident. > gnulib tests should not be worrying about glibc internals IMHO
Fair enough. > I notice the proposed glibc patch above has no associated tests? > I presume there are glibc units tests that should be updated? For the record, the glibc fix for this getaddrinfo bug was finally pushed today (commit glibc-2.17-716-g3d04f5d), and a test was also added (commit glibc-2.17-717-g47c2245). -- ldv
pgp4CD0YNPTQ9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
