Re: recent gnulib changes require coreutils adaptations

Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Comparing the differences in the sh -x output should >> help us get to the bottom of this. > > Yes, thanks, that did the trick. > > It turns out that my personal "ls" defaults to "ls -A" (this is an old > securit

Re: recent gnulib changes require coreutils adaptations

Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Comparing the differences in the sh -x output should > help us get to the bottom of this. Yes, thanks, that did the trick. It turns out that my personal "ls" defaults to "ls -A" (this is an old security-related habit of mine), but the coreutils bootstra

Re: recent gnulib changes require coreutils adaptations

Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I've tested the following versions of git: >> >> 1.5.3.rc1.27.ga5e40 >> 1.5.2.4 >> 1.4.4.4 > > Very strange. I'm using Debian stable git (1.4.4.4). > >> E.g., from a git-cloned coreutils work area, >> "git

Re: recent gnulib changes require coreutils adaptations

Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've tested the following versions of git: > > 1.5.3.rc1.27.ga5e40 > 1.5.2.4 > 1.4.4.4 Very strange. I'm using Debian stable git (1.4.4.4). > E.g., from a git-cloned coreutils work area, > "git-rm -n doc/.gitignore" should exit successfully. > Do

Re: recent gnulib changes require coreutils adaptations

Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> However, I can't reproduce that: >> >> $ git clone git://git.sv.gnu.org/coreutils.git cu \ >> && cd cu && ./bootstrap --gnulib-srcdir=/gnulib >> ... >> Creating ./._bootmp/lib/uniwidth/.gitignor

Re: recent gnulib changes require coreutils adaptations

Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I had to make some changes in order to get coreutils' >> bootstrap procedure to succeed once again: > > That didn't quite work for me: > >$ ./bootstrap --gnulib-srcdir=../gnulib >./bootstrap: Bootstrappin

Re: recent gnulib changes require coreutils adaptations

I notice that coreutils bootstrap has diverged from gnulib bootstrap. Was this intended? Here's the current difference (counting the coreutils patch I just proposed). Would there be any objection to installing these changes into gnulib? 2007-07-13 Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * boo

Re: recent gnulib changes require coreutils adaptations

Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I had to make some changes in order to get coreutils' > bootstrap procedure to succeed once again: That didn't quite work for me: $ ./bootstrap --gnulib-srcdir=../gnulib ./bootstrap: Bootstrapping from checked-out coreutils sources... ... ./

recent gnulib changes require coreutils adaptations

FYI, in case someone else has the same problems, I had to make some changes in order to get coreutils' bootstrap procedure to succeed once again: 2007-07-08 Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Adapt to deeper hierarchy in g