Re: [bug-patch] patch on x86-interix

2011-05-26 Thread Andreas Gruenbacher
On Thursday 26 May 2011 10:43:41 Markus Duft wrote: > On 05/25/11 22:43, Bruno Haible wrote: > > [CCing bug-gnulib] > > > > Markus Duft wrote in > > : > >> For quite a while now, i have patch working on x86-interix with a small > >

Re: patch on x86-interix

2011-05-26 Thread Markus Duft
On 05/26/11 12:35, Bruno Haible wrote: > Markus Duft wrote: >>> and send us the log files of these three commands, plus config.log and >>> gltests/config.log. >> >> all attached, except make check, as i could not run it, as make already >> failed :/ > > Thanks. The configure runs produce results

Re: patch on x86-interix

2011-05-26 Thread Bruno Haible
Markus Duft wrote: > > and send us the log files of these three commands, plus config.log and > > gltests/config.log. > > all attached, except make check, as i could not run it, as make already > failed :/ Thanks. The configure runs produce results similar to Interix 3.5., which is already cover

Re: patch on x86-interix

2011-05-26 Thread Bruno Haible
Markus Duft wrote: > it complains that: > > In file included from localcharset.c:29: > ./string.h:1059: error: conflicting types for 'mbsrchr' > /usr/include/string.h:84: error: previous declaration of 'mbsrchr' was here > make[4]: *** [localcharset.o] Error 1 > > where /usr/include/string.h does

Re: [bug-patch] patch on x86-interix

2011-05-26 Thread Markus Duft
On 05/26/11 10:51, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote: > On Thursday 26 May 2011 10:43:41 Markus Duft wrote: [snip] >> >> Trying to find out ;) First of all, patch seems to miss strnlen.c in the > tarball (2.6.1). it seems a well known problem, as even gentoo linux has a patch for this; see [1] and [2].

Re: patch on x86-interix

2011-05-25 Thread Bruno Haible
[CCing bug-gnulib] Markus Duft wrote in : > For quite a while now, i have patch working on x86-interix with a small patch > ( :D ). I'd really love to see this patch ([1]) go upstream, if that's ok > with you. Could you please ta